2018
DOI: 10.1159/000486538
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

47 Consecutive Cases of Pipeline Flex Flow Diversion Utilizing a Novel Large-Bore Intracranial Intermediate Catheter: Nuances and Institutional Experience with the Syphontrak

Abstract: Background: The increasing complexity of modern neurointerventions has necessitated a shift in intracranial access techniques towards more robust distal support platforms. Here we present our experience with the Syphontrak Support Catheter (Codman Neuro, Raynham, MA, USA) in the triaxial platform for the implantation of the second-generation Pipeline Flex embolization device (PED Flex; Medtronic Neurovascular, Irvine, CA, USA). Methods: We retrospectively identified patients who underwent PED Flex treatment ut… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In recent years, a number of similar case series have reported results using intermediate catheters during FDS cases to build triaxial systems that maximize support during stent deployment. [13][14][15] Direct comparison with these previous experiences is complicated by the fact that advancement of the TracStar LDP was not required or attempted in all cases. However, the high rate of cavernous access and low complication rate in this series should draw attention to the question as to whether distal 0.088 00 access can provide efficient alternative distal access catheter usage in select cases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, a number of similar case series have reported results using intermediate catheters during FDS cases to build triaxial systems that maximize support during stent deployment. [13][14][15] Direct comparison with these previous experiences is complicated by the fact that advancement of the TracStar LDP was not required or attempted in all cases. However, the high rate of cavernous access and low complication rate in this series should draw attention to the question as to whether distal 0.088 00 access can provide efficient alternative distal access catheter usage in select cases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When used in conjunction with long guiding sheaths, such as the Ballast, these DACs can provide the proximal support needed while simultaneously maintaining flexibility for improved navigation. This system allows for the delivery of a wide range of therapeutic devices through a larger ID, which is crucial for large modern neuroendovascular devices, such as flow diverters (15,21).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The delivery of neuroendovascular devices requires a catheter access platform which features robust proximal and distal support, and trackability through tortuous vasculature. [1][2][3][4] These requirements have been commonly met by the use of a triaxial system consisting of a guide catheter, intermediate catheter, and a microcatheter system. 5 6 An 0.088 inch (8Fr) guide catheter is often used in these set-ups to provide proximal support while traversing the aortic arch and large proximal vessels, with smaller diameter intermediate catheters used to provide distal support closer to the site of intervention.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%