Abstracts 2021
DOI: 10.1136/archdischild-2021-europaediatrics.470
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

470 Parental assessment on neurodevelopmental outcomes in children born late preterm at 2, 3, 5 and 8 years old

Abstract: Physical development of children is a marker of adequacy of nutrition, and affects adaptation, severity of pathological processes, rate of recovery, effectiveness of therapy, terms of hospitalization. Not enough teaching time is devoted to the study and training of nutrition status assessment skills in various ways.The skill of evaluation of physical development (FR) and nuthritical status (NS) was worked out on the questionnaire data of specific patients. The results of the programme WHO Antro assessment, the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In-person follow-up cases were minimal at the start of the pandemic and then opened to infants who, after virtual consults, were deemed to require occupational /physical therapy. At younger ages of 18-24 months, parental perception of developmental delays may be less reliable compared to the older pediatric population [24].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In-person follow-up cases were minimal at the start of the pandemic and then opened to infants who, after virtual consults, were deemed to require occupational /physical therapy. At younger ages of 18-24 months, parental perception of developmental delays may be less reliable compared to the older pediatric population [24].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…At younger ages of 18 to 24 months, parental perception of developmental delays may be less reliable compared with the older pediatric population. 24 NDI, as assessed by ASQ-3, is moderately reliable; however, this can be used in a pandemic situation where Bayley-III could not be performed. The risk of detection bias was present as members of the multidisciplinary team were not blinded at the time of assessment.…”
Section: Strengths and Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%