2020
DOI: 10.1093/ofid/ofaa439.674
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

481. Epidemic – Pandemic Impacts Inventory (EPII) Survey Results for Persons Living with HIV in Chicago’s West and Southwest Communities

Abstract: Background The rapid spread of COVID-19 in recent months has caused local and regional governments to enact protective measures that have hindered economies and imposed demanding restrictions on daily life. Households may be experiencing physical, psychological, social, and economic challenges due to these preventative measures. Populations with fewer resources and/or pre-existing conditions may be at higher risk for these negative, life-altering effects. Therefore, we investigated COVID-19 i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The items that made up the areas of negative impact for work life, home life, emotional/physical health and infection, and social activities and isolation were summed into EPII consequences (α = 0.97), while the 19 items of benefits were summed into EPII Benefits (α = 0.92). The EPII has been used successfully to identify COVID-19-related impacts in multiple samples and demonstrates adequate reliability and validity (Grasso, Briggs-Gowan, Carter, et al, 2020, 2021; Hunt et al, 2020).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The items that made up the areas of negative impact for work life, home life, emotional/physical health and infection, and social activities and isolation were summed into EPII consequences (α = 0.97), while the 19 items of benefits were summed into EPII Benefits (α = 0.92). The EPII has been used successfully to identify COVID-19-related impacts in multiple samples and demonstrates adequate reliability and validity (Grasso, Briggs-Gowan, Carter, et al, 2020, 2021; Hunt et al, 2020).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%