2019
DOI: 10.1002/mabi.201800441
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

4D Bioprinting: Technological Advances in Biofabrication

Abstract: its innate properties, or in response to external stimuli. Specifically, the SME can be seen in hybrid structures composed of a smart material and static material due to their inhomogeneity and different properties. [9,10] On the other hand, various stimuli, such as light, temperature, and humidity, can cause SMEs when a smart material converts the stimulus/energy into dynamic movement. With a detailed understanding of the properties of smart materials and their responses to stimuli, 4D printing can be utilize… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
67
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 106 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
67
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A future area of research is undoubtedly 4D printing, which essentially combines a 3D printing technique with smart materials that can respond to external stimuli, thereby reshaping or changing their function over time [150]. To do this, 4D printing employs hydrogels responsive to, i.e., temperature, pH, light, electric or magnetic field, or shape-memory polymers [151].…”
Section: Current Limitations Future Perspectives and Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A future area of research is undoubtedly 4D printing, which essentially combines a 3D printing technique with smart materials that can respond to external stimuli, thereby reshaping or changing their function over time [150]. To do this, 4D printing employs hydrogels responsive to, i.e., temperature, pH, light, electric or magnetic field, or shape-memory polymers [151].…”
Section: Current Limitations Future Perspectives and Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2) The shape and structure should be designed to resemble the natural tissue 78. 3) In addition, the crosslinking method for stabilization should not be toxic to the cells 79. On the other hand, condition of bio‐printing process including applied voltage, the moving speed of the orifice, and the feeding speed of the bio ink could influence the formation of the desired hydrogel 80.…”
Section: Bio‐printingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[78] 3) In addition, the crosslinking method for stabilization should not be toxic to the cells. [79] On the other hand, condition of bio-printing process including applied voltage, the moving speed of the orifice, and the feeding speed of the bio ink could influence the formation of the desired hydrogel. [80] Specifically, diameter of orifice should be enough to pass through the cells without damaging the cells when producing cell-laden hydrogel.…”
Section: Bio-printingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although 3D bioprinting signifi cantly progressed over the years, its limitations leads to the development of 4D bioprinting technology [102].…”
Section: Limitations For Bioprintingmentioning
confidence: 99%