2016
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-46720-7_69
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

4D Reconstruction of Fetal Heart Ultrasound Images in Presence of Fetal Motion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

2
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Note that this combined optimization allows for deviations from a regular heart rate. Its performance was confirmed by observer studies on in-vivo data when comparing it to the baseline and the state-of-the-art method from the initial study [14].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Note that this combined optimization allows for deviations from a regular heart rate. Its performance was confirmed by observer studies on in-vivo data when comparing it to the baseline and the state-of-the-art method from the initial study [14].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Due to the consistent performance of M6-L1, the lower runtime for OR and the slightly better performance of IF , we selected M6-L1-CD2-IF -OR as the best method of this study, which we call from now onwards proposed method. In all further tests, the proposed method is compared to the baseline (M0-OR×) and the state-of-the-art method [14] (M2-CD2-IF×-OR ). Fig.…”
Section: D Reconstruction Of Simulated Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…in Tanner et al . [TFE*16]). Another potential application is the generation of images from other modalities such as CT and fluoroscopy to facilitate image registration to ultrasound [BAK*12, OAA*12].…”
Section: Discussion and Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%