Penina Uliuli 2017
DOI: 10.1515/9780824863913-008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

5. Being ‘Afakasi

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A strength of the Tangata Hourua Framework is that it allows research of Māori and Pacific people together (Curtis, 2016; Harwood et al, 2018; Naepi, 2015), which is especially important for people who identify as Māori and Pacific multi-ethnic identities, who may experience a sense of not belonging (Agee & Culbertson, 2013; Berking et al, 2007; Keddell, 2014). Another strength is that it is simple or free of clutter, allowing core Māori and Pacific values to be clearly represented, so as to allow those who identify as Māori or Pacific to clearly see themselves reflected in the framework, the research, and the outcomes (Anae, 2001; Grimes et al, 2015; Royal, 2005).…”
Section: Strengths and Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A strength of the Tangata Hourua Framework is that it allows research of Māori and Pacific people together (Curtis, 2016; Harwood et al, 2018; Naepi, 2015), which is especially important for people who identify as Māori and Pacific multi-ethnic identities, who may experience a sense of not belonging (Agee & Culbertson, 2013; Berking et al, 2007; Keddell, 2014). Another strength is that it is simple or free of clutter, allowing core Māori and Pacific values to be clearly represented, so as to allow those who identify as Māori or Pacific to clearly see themselves reflected in the framework, the research, and the outcomes (Anae, 2001; Grimes et al, 2015; Royal, 2005).…”
Section: Strengths and Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%