2022
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-13387-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

5 days of time-restricted feeding increases fat oxidation rate but not affect postprandial lipemia: a crossover trial

Abstract: Studies have revealed that time-restricted feeding affects the fat oxidation rate; however, its effects on the fat oxidation rate and hyperlipidemia following high-fat meals are unclear. This study investigated the effects of 5-day time-restricted feeding on the fat oxidation rate and postprandial lipemia following high fat meals. In this random crossover experimental study, eight healthy male adults were included each in the 5-day time-restricted feeding trial and the control trial. The meals of the time-rest… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nighttime food intake may also increase the risk of dyslipidemia and hence potential of CVD due to postprandial TG metabolic dysfunction ( 70 ). Feeding time restricted within eight hours for five days can increase the fat oxidation rate in both fasting and non-fasting state, but cannot affect postprandial lipemia ( 71 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nighttime food intake may also increase the risk of dyslipidemia and hence potential of CVD due to postprandial TG metabolic dysfunction ( 70 ). Feeding time restricted within eight hours for five days can increase the fat oxidation rate in both fasting and non-fasting state, but cannot affect postprandial lipemia ( 71 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The quality of the 12 selected studies was evaluated using the ROB-2.0 and ROBINS-I evaluation tools [16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27]. The quality assessment results are presented in Figs.…”
Section: Evaluation Of the Quality Of The Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%