1993
DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.annonc.a058660
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

5-Fluorouracil, folinic acid, epidoxorubicin and cisplatin (FLEP) combination chemotherapy in advanced measurable gastric cancer. A phase II trial of the Spanish Cooperative Group for Gastrointestinal Tumor Therapy

Abstract: The FLEP regimen is an active combination in advanced gastric cancer with moderate toxicity that warrants further testing in a phase III trial.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nonetheless, this combination is clearly active in patients with advanced gastro-oesophageal cancer with an overall response rate of 38% in a limited number of evaluable patients. Whilst this is lower than the phase II response rates initially obtained with infusional 5-FU in combination with epirubicin and cisplatin (Findlay et al, 1994;Zaniboni et al, 1995), it is similar to that obtained with other platinum-containing regimens (Elliott et al, 1990;Sparano et al, 1990;Lacave et al, 1991;Cervantes et al, 1993;Bajetta et al, 1994Bajetta et al, , 1998Taal et al, 1994;Kondo et al, 1996;Cheng et al, 1998) or with ECF in randomized studies (Webb et al, 1997). The median survival of 9.9 months compares with 8.9 months obtained with ECF and between 7 and 11 months with other cisplatin-based therapies (Lacave et al, 1991;Cervantes et al, 1993;Bajetta et al, 1999Bajetta et al, , 1998Kondo et al, 1996;Cheng et al, 1998).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 57%
“…Nonetheless, this combination is clearly active in patients with advanced gastro-oesophageal cancer with an overall response rate of 38% in a limited number of evaluable patients. Whilst this is lower than the phase II response rates initially obtained with infusional 5-FU in combination with epirubicin and cisplatin (Findlay et al, 1994;Zaniboni et al, 1995), it is similar to that obtained with other platinum-containing regimens (Elliott et al, 1990;Sparano et al, 1990;Lacave et al, 1991;Cervantes et al, 1993;Bajetta et al, 1994Bajetta et al, , 1998Taal et al, 1994;Kondo et al, 1996;Cheng et al, 1998) or with ECF in randomized studies (Webb et al, 1997). The median survival of 9.9 months compares with 8.9 months obtained with ECF and between 7 and 11 months with other cisplatin-based therapies (Lacave et al, 1991;Cervantes et al, 1993;Bajetta et al, 1999Bajetta et al, , 1998Kondo et al, 1996;Cheng et al, 1998).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 57%
“…The EORTC study showed the FAMTX (5-FU/adriamicyn/methotrexate) was superior to FAM (5-FU/adriamycin/mitomic) in RR (41% versus 9%) and survival (42 versus 29 weeks). 7,9 A number of studies have found that PELF or similar combinations are more active and have other advantages over FAMTX [21][22][23] with a similar proportion of toxicities and toxic deaths. 21 Subsequently, a series of studies demonstrated that ECF (epirubicin/cisplatin/5-FU) led to longer survival than FAMTX (median OS 8.9 versus 5.8 months) 11,18 and a recent review of palliative chemotherapy for advanced gastric cancer confirmed that ECF currently represents one of the most effective regimens for advanced gastric cancer and among the newer combinations, irinotecan-or taxane-based regimens have given promising results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The important contribution of the 5-FU schedule has been emphasized by the results of a recently reported study in which a regimen consisting of the same drugs as ECF, but with 5-FU given as a bolus and the addition of folinic acid, produced inferior results. 33 In conclusion, ECF appears to be an effective, well tolerated regimen for advanced EG cancer. It produces symptomatic response in the majority of patients, with no negative impact in QL.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%