1991
DOI: 10.1177/026988119100500414
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

5-HT and mechanisms of defence

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

74
560
0
52

Year Published

2000
2000
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 917 publications
(686 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
74
560
0
52
Order By: Relevance
“…The observation that ATD increased punishment prediction concurs with classic and more recent findings indicating that 5-HT controls the processing of aversive signals (Tye et al, 1977;Iversen, 1984;Deakin and Graeff, 1991;Daw et al, 2002;Cools et al, 2005b;Pezawas et al, 2005;Harmer et al, 2006). More specifically, the selective effect of ATD on punishment prediction is consistent with a recent theoretical model, suggesting that in prediction learning 5-HT acts as a motivational opponent to dopamine, which is commonly implicated in the prediction of future reward (Daw et al, 2002).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The observation that ATD increased punishment prediction concurs with classic and more recent findings indicating that 5-HT controls the processing of aversive signals (Tye et al, 1977;Iversen, 1984;Deakin and Graeff, 1991;Daw et al, 2002;Cools et al, 2005b;Pezawas et al, 2005;Harmer et al, 2006). More specifically, the selective effect of ATD on punishment prediction is consistent with a recent theoretical model, suggesting that in prediction learning 5-HT acts as a motivational opponent to dopamine, which is commonly implicated in the prediction of future reward (Daw et al, 2002).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…In keeping with this hypothesis, recent neuroimaging observations suggest that the PFC controls amygdala activity when subjects are presented with negatively valenced stimuli (Ochsner et al, 2002;Phelps and LeDoux, 2005). Based on previous suggestions that 5-HT conveys resilience to adversity (Deakin and Graeff, 1991;Deakin, 1991;Richell et al, 2005), we hypothesize that ATD disrupts PFC-mediated control over subcortical brain regions, such as the amygdala and/or the dorsal raphe nucleus (Amat et al, 2005;Heinz et al, 2005;Pezawas et al, 2005). Such a top-down control failure may interact with reductions in 'background' levels of tonic 5-HT to bias the system toward anticipation of adversity (by increasing prediction errors for future punishment).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Moreover, previous reports have suggested that there may be an isomorphism between risk assessment in the Mouse Defense Test Battery and several behaviors often described in generalized anxiety disorder patients (Blanchard et al, 1997b) such as apprehensive expectation and vigilance and scanning involving hyper-attentiveness (DSM-IV, 1994). In addition, the observation that panic disorder patients usually report an urgent desire to flee from where the attack is occurring (DSM-IV, 1994), has led to suggestions that panic symptoms are due to pathological, spontaneous activation of neuronal mechanisms underlying flight reactions (Deakin and Graeff, 1991;Graeff, 1990). As such, flight behaviors in the Mouse Defense Test Battery may model certain aspects of panic (Griebel et al, 1996b).…”
Section: The Mouse Defense Test Battery: An Experimental Model Of Difmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two opposing hypotheses have been put forth to explain panic phenomena by 5-HTergic dysfunction: 5-HT excess or overactivity (Iversen, 1984;Kahn et al, 1988a, b) and 5-HT deficit or underactivity (Deakin and Graeff, 1991;Bell and Nutt, 1998). The 5-HT excess theory suggests that patients with PD either have an increased level of 5-HT release or a hypersensitivity in postsynaptic 5-HT receptors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%