Interventional Cardiology 2019
DOI: 10.1136/heartjnl-2019-bcs.48
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

50 Ischaemia and No Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease (INOCA): prevalence and predictors of coronary vasomotion disorders

Abstract: (4.6%), VT=1 (0.3%). ANS referrals resulted in greater trend towards change of management (38.2%) of patients compared with GC (32.7%) and EP (31.4%) (p=0.593 nurse vs. consultant). For those needing pacing, 24 were from ANS referrals compared to 25 for clinicians (23.5% vs 18.3% respectively, p=0.012). Median time to developing a pacing indication was 2.6 months for ANS and 4.1 months for clinicians; 25 had pacing indication within 3 months of ILR insertion. Overall, an ILR had a diagnostic yield of 34.1% (n=… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

6
63
1
3

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(73 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
6
63
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…This group of disorders includes microvascular angina, vasospastic angina or mixed microvascular/vasospastic angina, in the absence of obstructive (≥50% diameter stenosis) or flow‐limiting (fractional flow reserve ≤0.80; non‐hyperemic pressure ratio ≤ 0.89) CAD 13 . Patients with INOCA have a burden of anginal symptoms and typically poorer quality of life compared to patients with obstructive CAD 14 . Microvascular angina may be associated with obstructive CAD (Type 3 microvascular angina), or, alternatively, CAD may be falsely classified as obstructive when in fact the primary cause of angina is microvascular disease.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This group of disorders includes microvascular angina, vasospastic angina or mixed microvascular/vasospastic angina, in the absence of obstructive (≥50% diameter stenosis) or flow‐limiting (fractional flow reserve ≤0.80; non‐hyperemic pressure ratio ≤ 0.89) CAD 13 . Patients with INOCA have a burden of anginal symptoms and typically poorer quality of life compared to patients with obstructive CAD 14 . Microvascular angina may be associated with obstructive CAD (Type 3 microvascular angina), or, alternatively, CAD may be falsely classified as obstructive when in fact the primary cause of angina is microvascular disease.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mild myocarditis was less likely in the absence of an infective prodrome and a clinical presentation most in keeping with acute ischaemia, although cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) may be a useful test when there is clinical uncertainty. Microvascular dysfunction is a recognised cause of ischaemia3 but typically presents with a history of angina rather than a discrete episode of myocardial infarction. Similarly, coronary artery spasm usually presents with episodic chest pain of diurnal variation that responds rapidly to nitrates.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(10) Tailored treatment improves symptoms and quality of life. (11,12) Endotypes can be distinguished by an invasive coronary function test (CFT), using acetylcholine (ACH) (or equivalent) to evaluate coronary spasm and adenosine to evaluate IMD. (6) The most recent European Society of Cardiology guideline for chronic coronary syndromes as well as the latest expert consensus document, recommend to consider a CFT in all patients with ANOCA with persistent anginal symptoms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%