5014541 Continuous air monitoring apparatus and method

Sides, G. D.; Cates, Marion

doi:10.1016/0160-4120(92)90150-3

Cited by 2 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Consequently, considerable effort was devoted to the coupling of both the IMS [12][13][14] and the flame photometric detector (FPD) 15 with a second dimension of separation of a gas chromatograph (GC). Ideally, if the separation technique, such as GC, is orthogonal (independent from and does not relate) to the detection technique (IMS or FPD), the total system separation power could be markedly increased and become the multiplicity of the separation powers of both techniques.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Fast GC-PFPD system for field analysis of chemical warfare agents

Frishman

Amirav

2000

Field Analyt. Chem. Technol.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A fast gas chromatograph (GC) equipped with a pulsed‐flame photometric detector (PFPD) was designed and built with the intention of facilitating field analysis of the full range of chemical warfare agents (CWA). This GC‐PFPD system was tested with five organophosphorus and organosulfur CWA simulants that cover the volatility range of common CWA. Fast repetitive analysis was demonstrated with a cycle time as short as 30 s, combined with very low detection limits of 20 ng/m3 for organophosphorus CWA simulants and 200 ng/m3 for organosulfur compounds. With a longer analysis time of 80 s, a 3‐ng/m3 detection limit was demonstrated for DMMP. In the GC‐PFPD system, the separation power of each of these techniques is orthogonal and independent; thus, this hyphenated combination is characterized by a very low false‐alarm rate, combined with CWA identification capability at the molecular level. The large improvement in system selectivity is demonstrated in the direct analysis of a low level of triethylphosphate in the headspace of diesel fuel without any interference. The system inlet was heated and the sample path was inert without any metal, enabling fast response time and low detection limits for a low volatility agent such as VX. The same fast GC‐PFPD system could also be quickly and easily switched to a continuous sampling “sniff” mode of operation with 2‐s response time. Alternatively, it could be operated in a novel mode of thermally modulated inlet (TMI) that provided intermediate results between those of GC and “sniff” in terms of the trade‐off of response time and performance. The fast GC‐PFPD system is also characterized by low average hydrogen consumption (about 4 ml/min), small size, and low weight. No attempt was made to complete the system in terms of portable control electronics. The advantages and unique features of this system, as well as the importance of CWA identification at the molecular level, are discussed. © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Field Analyt Chem Technol 4: 170–194, 2000

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…A well-designed GC-FPD was developed 15 and is available from O. I. Analytical under the name "MINICAMS" (CMS Research Division of O. I. Analytical, Birmingham, AL). This system is very effective and characterized by very low detection limits for the full range of CWA with typical cycle time of 5 min.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%