2012
DOI: 10.1016/s1569-9056(12)60521-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

524 Doctor! Will I be dry? Factors determining recurrence after vesicovaginal fistula repair

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From fistula-related factors, women with larger fistula sizes (> 3cm) were 76% less likely to achieve successful surgical repair outcomes than women with small fistulae. Likewise, women whose fistulae were classified as type II and above based on Goh [ 21 , 38 , 42 ] and Waaldijk [ 49 , 50 , 67 , 74 ] classification methods were 58% less likely to have successful surgical repair outcome than women with type I fistulae. Patients whose urethral status was partially or totally damaged were 63% less likely to achieve successful surgical repair than a patient who had an intact urethra.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…From fistula-related factors, women with larger fistula sizes (> 3cm) were 76% less likely to achieve successful surgical repair outcomes than women with small fistulae. Likewise, women whose fistulae were classified as type II and above based on Goh [ 21 , 38 , 42 ] and Waaldijk [ 49 , 50 , 67 , 74 ] classification methods were 58% less likely to have successful surgical repair outcome than women with type I fistulae. Patients whose urethral status was partially or totally damaged were 63% less likely to achieve successful surgical repair than a patient who had an intact urethra.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From fistula-related factors, women with larger fistula sizes (> 3cm) were 76% less likely to achieve successful surgical repair outcomes than women with small fistulae. Likewise, women whose fistulae were classified as type II and above based on Goh [21,38,42] and Waaldijk [49,50,67,74] classification methods were 58% less likely to have…”
Section: Plos Onementioning
confidence: 99%