1988
DOI: 10.1049/el:19880180
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

565 Mbit/s optical PSK transmission system with endless polarisation control

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1988
1988
1993
1993

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In these formulas, [7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22] is the electrooptical constant [14], no is the ordinary refractive index of LiNbO3 (= 2.2125 for X = 1523 nm), E,, and E,, represent the x-and y-components of the external electrical field strength, respectively, caused by the voltage differences between the electrodes while w and c are the frequency and velocity of light in vacuum. Since the two waves propagate with different phase velocities, they show a phase retardation r at the output of the waveguide which is described by:…”
Section: The Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In these formulas, [7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22] is the electrooptical constant [14], no is the ordinary refractive index of LiNbO3 (= 2.2125 for X = 1523 nm), E,, and E,, represent the x-and y-components of the external electrical field strength, respectively, caused by the voltage differences between the electrodes while w and c are the frequency and velocity of light in vacuum. Since the two waves propagate with different phase velocities, they show a phase retardation r at the output of the waveguide which is described by:…”
Section: The Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the state of polarization (henceforth referred to as SOP) of the transported signal fluctuates as a result of changes in the temperature, stress and humidity of the fiber, a fading of the output electrical signal occurs. Several techniques to overcome this problem are known: polarization diversity, data-induced polarization switching, polarization scrambling, use of polarization maintaining fibers and use of a polarization controller [3]- [7]. From these techniques the one using a polarization controller yields the best receiver sensitivity.…”
Section: Introduction Ptical Coherent Detection Communication Systmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation