1951
DOI: 10.1039/jr9510002572
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

573. Hysteresis in transitions in solids

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

1953
1953
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An expansion of the baseline heat capacity of the specimen shows a reversible 0.2 J g -1°C-1 change in heat capacity between the crystalline forms in agreement with earlier studies [4]. Hysteresis in the transition between crystal structures is not unusual and has been observed in other systems [13,14]. One approach to establishing the absolute limit of this discrepancy between the transition point on cooling and that seen on heating is to observe the transition at progressively slower rates of temperature change and extrapolating the measurements to zero heating and cooling rates [15].…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 76%
“…An expansion of the baseline heat capacity of the specimen shows a reversible 0.2 J g -1°C-1 change in heat capacity between the crystalline forms in agreement with earlier studies [4]. Hysteresis in the transition between crystal structures is not unusual and has been observed in other systems [13,14]. One approach to establishing the absolute limit of this discrepancy between the transition point on cooling and that seen on heating is to observe the transition at progressively slower rates of temperature change and extrapolating the measurements to zero heating and cooling rates [15].…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 76%
“…1.696 £ 10 27 erg/cm. Using the Thomas-Staveley approximation [34] together with (020) plane growth, the derived value of s=DH o f is ca. 1.127 £ 10 28 cm.…”
Section: Dpls Studies On the Melt Crystallization Of Neat Spsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, it was assumed that the growth front was the (110) plane as for PBS ( b 0 = 0.45 nm) and the mode of spherulite growth was regime II growth 24, 25, 27, 42, 43. For the lateral surface energy of linear polymer crystals, the following relation holds:44 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%