2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.cjca.2011.07.487
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

587 Comparison of ejection fraction using MUGA and 3D echocardiography

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a recent investigation, 3DE was compared with multi-gated acquisition (MUGA) scanning for the assessment of EF. 8 While MUGA is an established method of serial EF measurement, radiation exposure is a concern with this technique, especially in patients undergoing chemotherapy or presenting symptoms of a weakened immune system. Three investigators, blinded to one another's results, interpreted a 3D echocardiogram immediately following a MUGA scan in 65 patients.…”
Section: Three-dimensional Echocardiographymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a recent investigation, 3DE was compared with multi-gated acquisition (MUGA) scanning for the assessment of EF. 8 While MUGA is an established method of serial EF measurement, radiation exposure is a concern with this technique, especially in patients undergoing chemotherapy or presenting symptoms of a weakened immune system. Three investigators, blinded to one another's results, interpreted a 3D echocardiogram immediately following a MUGA scan in 65 patients.…”
Section: Three-dimensional Echocardiographymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a recent investigation, 3DE was compared with multi-gated acquisition (MuGA) scanning for the assessment of EF. 8 Currently, the use of contrast enhancement in the assessment of LVEF by 3DE is not supported by published data, which offers an avenue for further investigation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%