2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2008.06.068
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

59. New Method of Scoliosis Deformity Assessment ISIS-2 System

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
18
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Zubovic et al 9 released the first manuscript confirming that ISIS 2 3D back shape measurements are valid for assessment and followup in patients with scoliosis. They concluded that ISIS 2 scans had excellent repeatability and found no statistically significant differences between ISIS 2 scans and X-rays in 111 patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zubovic et al 9 released the first manuscript confirming that ISIS 2 3D back shape measurements are valid for assessment and followup in patients with scoliosis. They concluded that ISIS 2 scans had excellent repeatability and found no statistically significant differences between ISIS 2 scans and X-rays in 111 patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are many surface methods, which are using for school screening examination of spine deformity [21][22][23][24]. They are not with correlation between trunk asymmetry and cob angle and there is risk of obtaining false negativity is low (high sensitivity) but false positivity is high (low specificity) of those methods of examinations [25][26][27][28][29].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…No entanto, como os demais sistemas tridimensionais, esse método necessita de um operador experiente (Berryman, Pynsent, Fairbank, & Disney, 2008). Ao analisar as questões referente à validade do sistema ISIS2, Zubovic et al (2008) não encontraram nenhuma diferença estatisticamente significativa entre os ângulos do ISIS2 e os ângulos Cobb. Do mesmo modo, Berryman et al (2008) também encontraram boa comparação entre os resultados do sistema ISIS2 e os ângulos Cobb.…”
Section: Estudosunclassified