1999
DOI: 10.1093/nar/27.1.158
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

5S Ribosomal RNA data bank

Abstract: This paper presents the updated version of the data base of ribosomal 5S ribonucleic acids (5S rRNA) and their genes (5S rDNA). This edition of the data bank contains 1889 primary structures of 5S rRNA and 5S rDNA. These include 60 archaebacterial, 439 eubacterial, 63 plastid, 9 mitochondrial and 1318 eukaryotic sequences. The nucleotide sequences of 5S rRNAs or 5S rDNAs are divided according to the taxonomic position of organisms. The sequences stored in the database can be viewed and retrieved using the taxo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Results of 16S rRNA phylogeny were consistent with those of a previous analysis (15). Both 23S rRNA-and 5S rRNA-based phylogenies consistently placed T. whippelii within the Actinobacteria, while a more detailed resolution of relationships between this organism and the actinomycetes with group B peptidoglycan and the cellulomonads was not possible, due to a lack of a sufficient number of related sequences in both 23S rRNA (2) and 5S rRNA (27) databases.…”
supporting
confidence: 81%
“…Results of 16S rRNA phylogeny were consistent with those of a previous analysis (15). Both 23S rRNA-and 5S rRNA-based phylogenies consistently placed T. whippelii within the Actinobacteria, while a more detailed resolution of relationships between this organism and the actinomycetes with group B peptidoglycan and the cellulomonads was not possible, due to a lack of a sufficient number of related sequences in both 23S rRNA (2) and 5S rRNA (27) databases.…”
supporting
confidence: 81%
“…454 datasets. Duplicate reads (100% identity) were removed and FASTA files divided into rRNA and non-rRNA reads by using BLASTn (top hit, e-values <0.0001, bit scores >50) to compare with a reference database comprised of combined SILVA release 106 SSU and LSU databases and a 5S database (80). Using BLASTx or LAST (79), non-rRNA reads were compared with a reference database (SI Appendix) and their taxonomic affiliation determined in MEGAN (81).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Encoded RNAs and RNA genes were identified by systematic sequence comparison to orthologous RNAs from different prokaryotic and eukaryotic species and to GenBank and to available RNA databases for specific RNA types (21)(22)(23)(24)(25). We did not consider other completely novel or non-consensus RNA variants (26,27).…”
Section: Identification Of Genes and Reading Frame Lengthmentioning
confidence: 99%