2001
DOI: 10.1161/01.hyp.38.1.6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

6-[ 18 F]Fluorodopamine Positron Emission Tomographic (PET) Scanning for Diagnostic Localization of Pheochromocytoma

Abstract: Abstract-The diagnosis and treatment of pheochromocytoma depend critically on effective means to localize the tumor.Computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging have good sensitivity but poor specificity for detecting pheochromocytoma, and nuclear imaging approaches such as 131 I-metaiodobenzylguanidine scintigraphy have limited sensitivity. Here we report initial results using 6-[18 F]fluorodopamine positron emission tomography (PET) scanning in the diagnostic localization of pheochromocytoma. Twenty-ei… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
111
0
6

Year Published

2004
2004
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 210 publications
(119 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
2
111
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Nonetheless, we found the combination of MRI and 123 I-MIBG to be sufficient in most cases. Although Timmers et al (2007a) recently reported the superiority of 18 F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography ( 18 F-FDG PET) in the evaluation of metastatic paraganglioma, one might argue that in our cohort, because most of the paragangliomas were benign, the use of 18 F-fluorodopamine or 18 F-fluoro-dihydroxyphenylalanine ( 18 F-FDOPA) PET would be more appropriate after negative MIBG imaging (Pacak et al 2001, Hoegerle et al 2002, Hoegerle et al 2003, Mackenzie et al 2007). In our study, the sensitive and specific assays for O-methylated catecholamine metabolites (metanephrine and normetanephrine) were introduced for screening only in the last few years.…”
Section: B Havekes Et Al: Screening In Sdhd Patientsmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Nonetheless, we found the combination of MRI and 123 I-MIBG to be sufficient in most cases. Although Timmers et al (2007a) recently reported the superiority of 18 F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography ( 18 F-FDG PET) in the evaluation of metastatic paraganglioma, one might argue that in our cohort, because most of the paragangliomas were benign, the use of 18 F-fluorodopamine or 18 F-fluoro-dihydroxyphenylalanine ( 18 F-FDOPA) PET would be more appropriate after negative MIBG imaging (Pacak et al 2001, Hoegerle et al 2002, Hoegerle et al 2003, Mackenzie et al 2007). In our study, the sensitive and specific assays for O-methylated catecholamine metabolites (metanephrine and normetanephrine) were introduced for screening only in the last few years.…”
Section: B Havekes Et Al: Screening In Sdhd Patientsmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…18 F-FDOPA targets the cell via the large amino acid transporter system (15), has previously shown good diagnostic results in other neuroendocrine tumors (15), and is currently recommended for head and neck PGL imaging as well as for metastatic disease in sporadic metastatic PGL (16). 18 F-FDA specifically enters the cell via the norepinephrine transporter and targets the catecholamine synthesis, storage, and secretion pathways (17,18). Although 18 F-FDA has shown mixed results in patients with more dedifferentiated PPGLs with underlying SDH subunit B (SDHB) mutations, it has shown a good diagnostic accuracy in primary as well as metastatic sporadic PPGLs (19)(20)(21).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Normal follow-up plasma metanephrine, and failure of 6-[ 18 F]fluorodopamine PET to detect an adrenal or extra-adrenal focus of radioactivity, excluded pheochromocytoma. 17 At that time the concentration of 6-[ 18 F]fluorodopaminederived radioactivity was found to be markedly decreased in the left ventricular myocardium (Figure 1). …”
mentioning
confidence: 91%