2016 IEEE Photonics Society Summer Topical Meeting Series (SUM) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/phosst.2016.7548773
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

60 Mb/s, 2 meters visible light communications in 1 klx ambient using an unlensed CMOS SPAD receiver

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, SPADs are still a relatively immature technology whose sensitivity is reduced by relatively low photon detection efficiencies and the unavoidable dead-time after a photon is detected. Results with small arrays of SPADs show that the negative impact of dead-time can be mitigated by using arrays of SPADs whose dead-time is shorter than the time between photons crossing the active area of each SPAD [4,5,6,7]. However, these results were obtained using prototype SPAD arrays that are not widely available.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, SPADs are still a relatively immature technology whose sensitivity is reduced by relatively low photon detection efficiencies and the unavoidable dead-time after a photon is detected. Results with small arrays of SPADs show that the negative impact of dead-time can be mitigated by using arrays of SPADs whose dead-time is shorter than the time between photons crossing the active area of each SPAD [4,5,6,7]. However, these results were obtained using prototype SPAD arrays that are not widely available.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An alternative method of increasing the signal to noise ratio of a receiver is to operate an APD above its breakdown voltage and place it in series with a quenching device, such as a resistor, to create a single photon avalanche diode (SPAD) [4,5]. Results obtained using optical receivers that incorporate arrays of SPADs (now known as silicon photomultipliers (SiPMs)) have been previously reported [6][7][8][9][10]. More recently, it has been suggested that receivers containing SiPMs will be more sensitive than receivers containing APDs if the photon detection efficiency (PDE) of the SiPM is higher than 14% [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%