2001
DOI: 10.1023/a:1006316418865
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Untitled

Abstract: Almost any type of sample has some utility when estimating population quantities. The focus in this paper is to indicate what type or combination of types of sampling can be used in various situations ranging from a sample designed to establish cause-effect or legal challenge to one involving a simple subjective judgment. Several of these methods have little or no utility in the scientific area but even in the best of circumstances, particularly complex ones, both probabilistic and non-probabilistic procedures… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
24
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This small proportion of nonresponse at CRLA does not provide a large enough Our models did not account for the design weights associated with the GRTS sample design to adjust the model-based estimators. Since equiprobable samples were drawn within each park with a probabilistic method unrelated to the outcome of interest, the design can be ignored in a model-based approach [40]. However, nonresponse error due to inaccessible sites may impact inference if the mean of the outcome of interest for accessible sites is significantly different from the mean at inaccessible sites.…”
Section: Cwdmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This small proportion of nonresponse at CRLA does not provide a large enough Our models did not account for the design weights associated with the GRTS sample design to adjust the model-based estimators. Since equiprobable samples were drawn within each park with a probabilistic method unrelated to the outcome of interest, the design can be ignored in a model-based approach [40]. However, nonresponse error due to inaccessible sites may impact inference if the mean of the outcome of interest for accessible sites is significantly different from the mean at inaccessible sites.…”
Section: Cwdmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are some limitations in the study. As noted by Schreuder et al (2001) , purposive sampling does not provide a probabilistic or representative sample. Consequently, while assumptions for the NHS as a whole may be made, the research can only be applied to the geographical area identified for the sample.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is a nonprobability data collection technique used to study population subgroups and identify and select informants who are knowledgeable about or have experience with the subject area of interest. The method is also suitable for making comparisons between cases (Etikan et al 2016; Palinkas et al 2015; Ford et al 2009; Teddlie and Yu 2007; Guarte and Barrios 2006; Schreuder et al 2001). It is appropriate for qualitative and quantitative analyses (Tongco and Dolores 2007).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%