2000
DOI: 10.1023/a:1006402719458
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Untitled

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
3

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
5
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The de-epoxidation state (DEPS) provides information on xanthophyll cycle activity and the degree of violaxanthin to zeaxanthin conversion. It was defined as (0.5A + Z)/(V + A + Z) following (Pospisilova et al, 2000). DEPSC is the value of DEPS relative to total chlorophyll production.…”
Section: Photosynthetic and Photoprotective Pigmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The de-epoxidation state (DEPS) provides information on xanthophyll cycle activity and the degree of violaxanthin to zeaxanthin conversion. It was defined as (0.5A + Z)/(V + A + Z) following (Pospisilova et al, 2000). DEPSC is the value of DEPS relative to total chlorophyll production.…”
Section: Photosynthetic and Photoprotective Pigmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Photoprotection in higher plants is still not completely understood, and the actual response of plants to eCO 2 can depend strongly on abiotic stresses, including drought and temperature. Indeed, individual studies report diverse responses of the xanthophyll cycle in leaves exposed to eCO 2 with significant decreases, no changes, or significant increases in the mass of (V + A + Z) and the ratio of Z to (V + A) . Such variability reported in individual studies does not exclude a possibility that rising CO 2 downshifts the demand for NPQ and the xanthophyll cycle in C3 plants on the global scale.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Plants cultivated in vitro often present peculiar characteristics, such as poorly developed shoots, tissues with low mechanical strength, higher water content, non-functional stomata and small, thin leaves with fewer trichomes and low photoautotrophic activity (Kozai and Kubota 2001;Cha-um et al 2011;Xiao et al 2011). These anomalies become negative features during transfer of in vitro plants into the greenhouse or field conditions, causing slow establishment and low survival rate (Pospíšilová et al 2000;Hazarika 2006;Saez et al Sáez et al 2012). Only few works have been documented about anatomical disorders on in vitro propagated bromeliad species (Carvalho et al 2014;Martins et al 2014), but how they might interfere on survival and growth rates of bromeliads after transfer to greenhouse is still unclear.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%