2005
DOI: 10.1002/mrm.20568
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

64‐channel array coil for single echo acquisition magnetic resonance imaging

Abstract: A 64-channel array coil for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has been designed and constructed. The coil was built to enable the testing of a new imaging method, single echo acquisition (SEA) MRI, in which an independent full image is acquired with every echo. This is accomplished by entirely eliminating phase encoding and instead using the spatial information obtained from an array of very narrow, long, parallel coils. The planar pair element design proved to be key in achieving welllocalized field sensitivit… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
82
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 101 publications
(84 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
2
82
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, single-echo-acquisition (SEA) was achieved using a dedicated 64-channel linear planar array that eliminated phase encoding, instead using the spatial information obtained from an array of long and parallel coils. This planar pair element design proved to be crucial for achieving well-localized field sensitivity patterns (McDougall and Wright, 2005). In other work, Hennig developed the one-voxel-one-coil (OVOC) MRencephalography technique, obtaining a reconstructed image by computing the product of a full FOV reference scan and the accelerated acquisition scan where traditional phase and frequency encoding can be selectively omitted.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, single-echo-acquisition (SEA) was achieved using a dedicated 64-channel linear planar array that eliminated phase encoding, instead using the spatial information obtained from an array of long and parallel coils. This planar pair element design proved to be crucial for achieving well-localized field sensitivity patterns (McDougall and Wright, 2005). In other work, Hennig developed the one-voxel-one-coil (OVOC) MRencephalography technique, obtaining a reconstructed image by computing the product of a full FOV reference scan and the accelerated acquisition scan where traditional phase and frequency encoding can be selectively omitted.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To this end, dense head coil arrays consisting of 16 de Zwart et al, 2002;de Zwart et al, 2004), 23, 32 and 90 elements (Wiggins et al, 2005a;Wiggins et al, 2005b) have been constructed in support of a range of parallel acquisition applications. In addition, a dedicated 64-channel linear planar array has been developed to achieve 64-fold acceleration (McDougall and Wright, 2005). Notably, the geometric configuration of our 32-channel head array is remarkably similar to that used for electrode and super-conducting quantum interference (SQUID) sensor arrays in modern EEG and MEG systems (Hamalainen et al, 1993).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the development of array coils with 32 or more elements has only recently being explored (3)(4)(5), the sensitivity advantages of highly parallel arrays of small surface coils for deep tissue have been demonstrated in theoretical analysis (6 -9). Wright and Wald (8) simulated the sensitivity vs. depth for a square planar array covering given surface area utilizing either an 8 ϫ 8 array (64 elements) or a 4 ϫ 4, 2 ϫ 2 or single coil (1 ϫ 1), all covering the same area above a lossy half plane, using a full-wave approach that assumed ideal decoupling.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is important to note that HAPI can be implemented on a moderately equipped conventional scanner with an eightchannel coil, unlike other single-echo imaging techniques 5,6 that require RF coil arrays with 64 to 90 elements. The essence of the HAPI technique is to densely sample a projection, which should be acquired at an angle other than 0…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%