Despite the apparent health benefits of social relationships, some studies indicate that larger social networks can be associated with greater vulnerability to infectious disease, particularly if stressors are also present. Two possibilities for such effects are, first, that more social contacts lead to more negative affect and social conflict during stressors, or second, that maintaining more social contacts is an energetically costly activity, and ecologically motivated immunosuppression is one means of providing energy to maintain social resources. First-year law students (N = 76) completed questionnaires and had delayed-type hypersensitivity skin tests at five time points during their first 6 months of law school. Both moving away from home and a smaller social network associated with larger DTH responses (both p < .05) across all time points. However, negative affect, either broadly defined or as specific affects (hostility, sadness, guilt), did not mediate social network effects, suggesting that negative affect and social conflict are less plausible explanations than ecological immunosuppression. Ecological models would predict that temporary immunosuppression is less harmful to health in the long run than loss of social resources.Social relationships seem to yield significant health benefits, with the mortality risk of a small social network approximately equaling that for cigarette smoking (House et al., 1988). One potential pathway between social connectedness and clinical health is physiological: higher social support is associated with lower tonic blood pressure, reduced cardiovascular reactivity, and higher functional immune assays (e.g., natural killer cell cytotoxicity) and, conversely, loneliness is associated with elevated cortisol and lower functional immune assays (see Cacioppo et al., 2000;Uchino et al., 1996; for reviews). Beneficial effects of social relationships extend to non-human animals. For example, juvenile macaques separated from their mothers had higher lymphocyte proliferative responses if they were housed with conspecifics with whom they had "significant, complex relationships" than if they were housed alone; furthermore, proliferative responses were positively correlated with degree of affiliation with others during the separation (Boccia et al., 1997, p. 193).However, there are some notable cases in which a larger number of social relationships negatively correlated with immunity and health. Miller and Cole (1998) reviewed 10 studies of social relationships and HIV progression. In these studies, loneliness and other measures of low emotional satisfaction with social relationships associated with faster HIV progression. However, larger social network size and other measures of greater social integration such as intent to participate in social activities and greater affinity with social networks also associated with faster progression. An interaction between stress and social connectedness was observed Correspondence to: Suzanne C. Segerstrom, Ph.D., Department of Psycholo...