2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2021.08.049
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

653O Pembrolizumab (pembro) vs placebo as adjuvant therapy for patients (pts) with renal cell carcinoma (RCC): Patient-reported outcomes (PRO) in KEYNOTE-564

Abstract: Background: The randomized, double-blind, phase III KEYNOTE-564 (NCT03142334) study met its primary endpoint of disease-free survival with adjuvant pembro vs placebo following surgery in pts with RCC. We present PRO findings for adjuvant pembro vs placebo in KEYNOTE-564.Methods: PRO were evaluated in all randomized pts with !1 dose study treatment and !1 completed assessment for the specific outcome. FKSI-DRS and EORTC QLQ-C30 were administered electronically at cycles 1, 5, 9, 13, and 17, treatment discontinu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The secondary endpoints of health-related quality of life and physical functioning by European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire and disease symptoms by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Kidney Symptom Index-Disease-Related Symptoms tools were previously published for the protocol-specified first interim analysis of the study (with a data cutoff date of Dec 14, 2020). 18,20…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The secondary endpoints of health-related quality of life and physical functioning by European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire and disease symptoms by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Kidney Symptom Index-Disease-Related Symptoms tools were previously published for the protocol-specified first interim analysis of the study (with a data cutoff date of Dec 14, 2020). 18,20…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Наибольший выигрыш ОВ на фоне кабозантиниба с ниволумабом реализовался после удаления первичной опухоли (ОР 0,54; 95% ДИ 0,37-0,78), в то время как у пациентов, которым нефрэктомия не выполнялась, разница результатов между группами в отношении ОВ оказалась недостоверна. Интересно, что у больных с большой опухолевой нагрузкой (суммой диаметров таргетных очагов ≥72 мм) было зарегистрировано значимое увеличение ОВ в группе комбинации (ОР 0,64; 95% ДИ 0,46-0,89), в то время как при малой опухолевой нагрузке различия ОВ оказались недостоверны [29][30][31].…”
Section: кабозантиниб в комбинации с ниволумабом в 1-й линии терапии ...unclassified
“…Immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) antibodies block the interactions between Programmed Death-1 (PD-1) expressed on activated and "exhausted" T cells and the PD-L1 ligand expressed on cancer cells and tumor-associated immune cells in the tumor microenvironment (TME) to unleash a T cell immune attack against cancer cells (1)(2)(3). ICB-targeted therapies have improved clinical outcomes in numerous clinical trials, and several are now approved for multiple cancer indications usually in combination with chemotherapy in the neoadjuvant and adjuvant settings (4)(5)(6)(7). While much success has been achieved using these agents, curative responses occur in only a fraction of patients.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%