2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.11.390
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

656: The effect of birth location on neonatal and maternal morbidity/mortality for breech-presenting term fetuses

Abstract: a cesarean delivery in a woman with a high-risk pregnancy is twofold (aOR 1.99, CI 1.92-2.06) if she is cared for in a hospital within the high-cesarean-delivery-rate group than in one within the low/mid-cesarean-delivery-rate group. Meanwhile, we found no significant difference in neonatal outcomes or maternal outcomes between patients delivered in a high vs. low-cesarean-delivery-rate hospital. CONCLUSION: Individual hospitals are in themselves independent risk factors for cesarean delivery, regardless of ho… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The highest risk groups within these factors are women below 20 years of age and older than 35 [18], nulliparous (first pregnancy) or grand multiparous (parity > 4) [19], underweight (body-mass index (BMI) < 18.5 kg/m 2 ) or overweight (> 30 kg/m 2 ) [20,21], or have a symphysis-fundal height of less than 35 cm or greater than 40 cm at the third trimester [22,23]. Furthermore, patients with an obstetrical history of any of: previous hemorrhage [24], previous stillbirth or miscarriage [25], previous breech delivery [26], previous twins (or more) [27], previous pregnancy within 1.5 years or greater than 5 years ago [28], and reported reduction in fetal movements [22] were grouped as: high risk (1 of these conditions) or extremely high risk (2 or more of these conditions). Co-existing conditions (maternal sepsis [29], fever with ruptured membranes [30], human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) [24,31], anemia [31], tuberculosis [31], female genital mutilation [32,33], diabetes [29], and malaria [23,31]) were also recorded on 2-levels (high risk and extremely high risk) based on the number and type of conditions the woman presented with (Table 1).…”
Section: Cmds Domainsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The highest risk groups within these factors are women below 20 years of age and older than 35 [18], nulliparous (first pregnancy) or grand multiparous (parity > 4) [19], underweight (body-mass index (BMI) < 18.5 kg/m 2 ) or overweight (> 30 kg/m 2 ) [20,21], or have a symphysis-fundal height of less than 35 cm or greater than 40 cm at the third trimester [22,23]. Furthermore, patients with an obstetrical history of any of: previous hemorrhage [24], previous stillbirth or miscarriage [25], previous breech delivery [26], previous twins (or more) [27], previous pregnancy within 1.5 years or greater than 5 years ago [28], and reported reduction in fetal movements [22] were grouped as: high risk (1 of these conditions) or extremely high risk (2 or more of these conditions). Co-existing conditions (maternal sepsis [29], fever with ruptured membranes [30], human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) [24,31], anemia [31], tuberculosis [31], female genital mutilation [32,33], diabetes [29], and malaria [23,31]) were also recorded on 2-levels (high risk and extremely high risk) based on the number and type of conditions the woman presented with (Table 1).…”
Section: Cmds Domainsmentioning
confidence: 99%