Untitled

Abstract

The developers of clinical exams for US mental health licensure have faced significant recent criticism and calls for their exams to be paused or discontinued. 1,2 Critics cite concerns over exams lacking evidence of validity, while they demonstrate strong evidence of racial and ethnic bias. Developers, in turn, argue that their exams are developed using accepted methods that conform with industry standards, specifically, the Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing. 3 This manuscript challenges that assertion. Based on external research as well as developers' own statements and publications, clinical exams for US mental health care licensure appear to deviate in important ways from both the letter and the spirit of the Standards. Clinical exams should be paused unless and until they are shown to be fair, equitable, valid, and more fully consistent with industry norms.