Enabling Positive Change: Flow and Complexity in Daily Experience 2015
DOI: 10.2478/9783110410242.7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

7 Positive Change and Political Participation: Well-Being as an Indicator of the Quality of Citizens’ Engagement

Abstract: Political participation has long been considered as a source of benefits for the community. Its role in the evolution of society has been assessed through diverse social indicators, from which well-being has been assigned a central position. In this chapter we look at the historical progress of such indicators, highlighting the contribution of psychology. We suggest that a eudaimonic perspective can explain the link between individuals' well-being and participation. In particular flow can be used as referentia… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Existing measurement tools for ART are mainly quantitative (e.g., Hartig et al, 1997 ; Pasini and Berto, 2007 ; Pasini et al, 2014 ), which implies the administration of scales to the participants involved in the process. Such an approach has both positive aspects (e.g., brief administration, if not associated with other scales; quantitative data; a more easily replicable data collection) and downsides (e.g., the need for a higher number of participants; a pre-defined set of items that may not best fit the specific context; less space for emerging data), which must be accurately taken into account when designing an engagement process that is psychologically sustainable for citizens (Boffi et al, 2015 ). Our attempt was, instead, to develop a qualitative tool that allowed us to collect two types of data at the same time.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Existing measurement tools for ART are mainly quantitative (e.g., Hartig et al, 1997 ; Pasini and Berto, 2007 ; Pasini et al, 2014 ), which implies the administration of scales to the participants involved in the process. Such an approach has both positive aspects (e.g., brief administration, if not associated with other scales; quantitative data; a more easily replicable data collection) and downsides (e.g., the need for a higher number of participants; a pre-defined set of items that may not best fit the specific context; less space for emerging data), which must be accurately taken into account when designing an engagement process that is psychologically sustainable for citizens (Boffi et al, 2015 ). Our attempt was, instead, to develop a qualitative tool that allowed us to collect two types of data at the same time.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Citizens' involvement in transformation processes generally mitigates these types of disagreements [32]. However, traditional participatory processes may encounter difficulties in engaging the weaker segments of the population [24,26], which implies the need for a contextual design of the engagement strategy to favor sustainable participation for citizens [33].…”
Section: Nbs and The Relevance Of Citizens Engagementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was effectively integrated with data presenting potential solutions for the CG. It emphasized the active role of the participants in the co-design, creating a positive participatory setting adaptable to the competences of the heterogeneous population involved in the process [69].…”
Section: User Needs Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%