2008
DOI: 10.1016/s0016-5085(08)60464-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

702 Efficacy and Safety of Delayed-Release Oral mesalamine At 4.8g/D (800mg Tablet) in the Treatment of Moderately Active Ulcerative Colitis: Results of the Ascend III Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Farup et al (46) compared the efficacy of an equal dose of a prolonged-release granule formulation of mesalazine (4 g/day, Pentasa sachet) divided into twice daily versus four times daily, with that of prolonged-release mesalazine tablets at two doses of 0.5 g four times daily in 227 patients with mild to moderately active UC. Granules were as effective as tablets, and twice- (37)(38)(39) daily dosing was as effective as more frequent dosing (46). Once again, the study was designed to confirm the noninferiority of the granule formulation to the tablet formulation.…”
Section: Once-daily 5-asa Granulesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Farup et al (46) compared the efficacy of an equal dose of a prolonged-release granule formulation of mesalazine (4 g/day, Pentasa sachet) divided into twice daily versus four times daily, with that of prolonged-release mesalazine tablets at two doses of 0.5 g four times daily in 227 patients with mild to moderately active UC. Granules were as effective as tablets, and twice- (37)(38)(39) daily dosing was as effective as more frequent dosing (46). Once again, the study was designed to confirm the noninferiority of the granule formulation to the tablet formulation.…”
Section: Once-daily 5-asa Granulesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A subgroup analysis showed that high‐dose 5‐ASA achieved patient symptom relief faster compared with the lower‐dose 5‐ASA. Data from the ASCEND studies also support the notion that more intensive therapy (i.e., higher doses) introduced at an earlier stage of moderately active disease may be beneficial; in the recent ASCEND III study a therapeutic advantage of 4.8 g/day was seen in patients with a clinical history of more difficult to treat disease, including previous use of rectal therapies, steroids, or immunomodulators 49. These findings should be interpreted in the context of the formulation tested and the study designs in relation to the definitions of “improvement” and “remission”; the same dose–efficacy relationship does not appear to hold true for other 5‐ASA formulations including ethyl‐cellulose coated mesalamine granules (Pentasa),27 lower dose pH coated mesalamine (Asacol),47 balsalazide,50 or olsalazine 51.…”
Section: Maintaining Remissionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…The recent ASCEND III study confirmed the clinical benefit of delayed-release mesalazine 4.8 g ⁄ day in patients with moderately active UC; the therapeutic advantage of this higher dose compared with 2.4 g ⁄ day was most evident in patients with previous use of oral mesalazine and rectal therapies. 22…”
Section: Multi-matrix (Mmx) Mesalazine (12 G Tablet)mentioning
confidence: 99%