2020
DOI: 10.1109/jlt.2020.2996188
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

800G DSP ASIC Design Using Probabilistic Shaping and Digital Sub-Carrier Multiplexing

Abstract: The design of application-specific integrated circuit (ASIC) is at the core of modern ultra-high-speed transponders employing advanced digital signal processing (DSP) algorithms. This manuscript discusses the motivations for jointly utilizing transmission techniques such as probabilistic shaping and digital sub-carrier multiplexing in digital coherent optical transmissions systems. We firstly report the key-building blocks of high-speed modern DSP-based transponders working up to 800G per wave. Secondly, we sh… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
85
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 213 publications
(86 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
85
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We present the results of subcarrier-independent pilot-based CPE and DRS algorithms for 4, 8, and 32 SCs. In all cases, the DRS algorithm is shown to clearly outperform the best subcarrierindependent pilot-based approach, while enabling an ever-increasing performance with higher SC count, thus overcoming the well-known degradation of MSC performance with lower SC symbol rates [1] . It is worth noting that the gain provided by the DRS algorithm is further evidenced for large combined linewidths.…”
Section: Numerical Performance Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We present the results of subcarrier-independent pilot-based CPE and DRS algorithms for 4, 8, and 32 SCs. In all cases, the DRS algorithm is shown to clearly outperform the best subcarrierindependent pilot-based approach, while enabling an ever-increasing performance with higher SC count, thus overcoming the well-known degradation of MSC performance with lower SC symbol rates [1] . It is worth noting that the gain provided by the DRS algorithm is further evidenced for large combined linewidths.…”
Section: Numerical Performance Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Digital subcarrier multiplexing systems have been gaining both academic and commercial interest lately due to their associated advantages [1]- [6] , namely in terms of inherent DSP parallelism, enhanced bit-rate granularity [2], [3] and higher tolerance against Chromatic Dispersion (CD) [4] , Nonlinear Interference Noise (NLIN) [5], [6] and Equalization-Enhanced Phase Noise (EEPN) [1] . However, they also still present an important disadvantage from the Carrier Phase Estimation (CPE) point of view, due to the increased symbol periods [1] . In order to try and circumvent this limitation, several joint-subcarrier CPE schemes have been proposed [7]- [9] , but these solutions are not specifically aimed at maintaining the increased tolerance to CD that is brought by MSC systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is challenging to implement ADCs with high sampling rates. While digital subcarrier multiplexing offers one path to limiting symbol rate at the system level [3,13], choice of oversampling is a trade-off available during receiver implementation. An oversampling of 2 samples per symbol (SPS) has been common, since this choice relaxes ADC requirements and enables powerful equalization schemes [7].…”
Section: Dsp For Intradyne Coherent Receiversmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The current and future requirements from optical line system (OLS) operators, cloud service providers and end users are producing a progressive yearly increase in demand for higher transmission rates and larger optical network capacities and throughput [1]- [3] . Correspondingly, optical networks are shifting to a format that enables a greater degree of flexibility with respect to wavelength assignment, transmission standards and symbol rates, representing a shift towards a disaggregated structure [4]- [6] . A fully disaggregated network approach requires all OLS components to be considered independently [7] , as they may be controlled by different network providers and operators.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%