2000
DOI: 10.1023/a:1004770115044
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Untitled

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…19 − 10 20 eV , including topological defects such as cosmic strings [6,7] and associated decays of heavy, relic particles [8,9], existence of neutral, stable, strongly interacting particles, such as a light gluino [10,11,12] or a monopole bound state [13,14], and violation of Lorentz invariance [15,16]. Much of this work requires that the primary particle responsible for generating these air showers is an exotic new particle which does not exist within the Standard Model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…19 − 10 20 eV , including topological defects such as cosmic strings [6,7] and associated decays of heavy, relic particles [8,9], existence of neutral, stable, strongly interacting particles, such as a light gluino [10,11,12] or a monopole bound state [13,14], and violation of Lorentz invariance [15,16]. Much of this work requires that the primary particle responsible for generating these air showers is an exotic new particle which does not exist within the Standard Model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This argument is used by many people for various other effects, too [8,9]. And there are measurements, that would favor the existence of light gauginos [5,8,[10][11][12], see especially the discussion in [11].…”
Section: Why Are They Not Seen Yet?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, if gaugino masses are universal at the GUT scale, gluinos must be rather heavy considering the bound on the chargino mass from LEP2 [30], which makes the contribution smaller. We can ignore safely the light gluino window [31] because it is inconsistent with the experimental bound on the mass of the lightest Higgs boson in the MSSM [32]. In the decay amplitude [1], it appears the matrix Rt the rotation matrix which diagonalizes the stop quark mass matrix [33] necessary to take into account the left-right mixing in the stop mass matrix.…”
Section: H ± Mass and B → Sγ Decaymentioning
confidence: 99%