Untitled

Katz, Jennifer; Kuffel, Stephanie Washington; Coblentz, A.

doi:10.1023/a:1016005312091

Cited by 110 publications

(23 citation statements)

References 36 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…A sequence of positive interactions enhances relationship satisfaction, while the accumulation of unresolved conflicting and violent interactions erode satisfying feelings about the relationship (Lawrence & Bradbury, 2007). The association between the presence of IPV victimization and less relationship satisfaction has repeatedly been illustrated (e.g., Fournier, Brassard, & Shaver, 2011;Godbout, Dutton, Lussier, & Sabourin, 2009;Katz, Kuffel, & Coblentz, 2002;Testa & Leonard, 2001). Still, the question whether IPV victimization takes a toll on the level of relationship satisfaction is more complex than one would expect (Lawrence & Bradbury, 2007).…”

Section: Ipv and Relational Well-beingmentioning

confidence: 99%

Prevalence of Intimate Partner Violence Victimization and Victims’ Relational and Sexual Well-Being

et al. 2015

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Ipv and Relational Well-beingmentioning

confidence: 99%

Prevalence of Intimate Partner Violence Victimization and Victims’ Relational and Sexual Well-Being

et al. 2015

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…The association between physical victimization and depressive symptoms, however, remains poorly understood leading some researchers to call for the need to distinguish between types and severity of violence (e.g., Carbone-Lopez et al, 2006; Graham et al, 2012; Sabina and Straus, 2008). Yet intimate partner violence is only one component of a constellation of indicators reflecting poor relationship quality (Giordano et al, 2010; Halpern-Meekin et al, 2013; Katz et al, 2002; Lawrence and Bradbury, 2007; Rhoades et al, 2010; Scott et al, 2011). We argued that to understand the effect of physical violence victimization on depressive symptoms, it should be examined in tandem with other negative relational dynamics, such as controlling behaviors and poor communication.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Intimate partner victimization, poor relationship quality, and depressive symptoms during young adulthood

Longmore

Manning

Giordano

et al. 2014

Social Science Research

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Examining longitudinal data from the Toledo Adolescent Relationships Study (TARS) (n = 927), we assessed associations between physical victimization by an intimate partner, indicators of poor relationship quality, and depressive symptoms among young adult men and women in casually dating, exclusively dating, cohabiting, and marital relationships. In zero-order models, we found that physical victimization increased depressive symptoms. In multivariate models, victimization was a risk factor for depressive symptoms with the inclusion of prior depressive symptoms, family factors reflecting the intergenerational transmission of violence, sociodemographic background, and relationship characteristics including union status. Yet with the additional inclusion of indicators of poor relational quality, victimization was not a significant predictor of depressive symptoms. Arguing and poor communication influenced victimization and depressive symptoms. The associations between victimization and depressive symptoms did not differ by gender, nor were the effects of poor relationship quality on depressive symptoms conditional on gender. Thus, depressive symptoms are similarly responsive to intimate partner victimization, and for both women and men these associations were not significant with the inclusion of indicators of poor relationship quality. Findings underscored that victimization often occurs within relationship contexts characterized by a range of negative dynamics; thus multifaceted relationship-centered prevention and intervention efforts are likely to be more useful than those focusing only on negative messages about the use of aggression with an intimate partner.

show abstract

“…Although it is still the case that the majority of studies focus on male-perpetrated aggression, some that have included both men and women in the same study have found comparable rates of physical and psychological dating violence perpetration (Harned, 2001;Katz et al, 2002;Prospero, 2007;Riggs et al, 1990;Shorey et al, 2008;Stappenbeck & Fromme, 2014;Straus, 2008). Other studies have found that women were more likely to perpetrate psychological dating violence (Moore et al, 2011) and a combination of psychological and physical dating violence (Rothman et al, 2011) compared with men.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Daily Associations Between Alcohol Consumption and Dating Violence Perpetration Among Men and Women: Effects of Self-Regulation

Stappenbeck

Gulati

Fromme

2016

J. Stud. Alcohol Drugs

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

ABSTRACT. Objective: Alcohol intoxication has been associated with dating violence perpetration, defi ned here as psychological and/ or physical violence occurring between young adult dating partners. However, little is known about how the individual variability in the level of alcohol intoxication would infl uence dating violence perpetration and how sex and self-regulation might infl uence this association. Method: College-aged men and women (N = 146) from a large southwestern U.S. university completed background questionnaires, including the Brief Self-Control Scale, to assess self-regulation and then reported their dating violence perpetration and alcohol consumption using a 90-day Timeline Followback assessment. Their average estimated blood alcohol concentration (eBAC) and their daily deviation from this average were calculated for each of the 90 days to examine the between-and withinperson effects of alcohol consumption, respectively. Results: Results of a two-level generalized estimating equation suggest that increases in daily eBAC were associated with an increased likelihood of perpetrating dating violence; however, this association was stronger for those who had a low average eBAC compared with those who had a high average eBAC. For those who had a low average eBAC, higher self-regulation was associated with a lower probability of perpetrating dating violence, whereas among those with a high average eBAC, self-regulation was not associated with dating violence perpetration. Sex did not moderate the association between eBAC and dating violence perpetration. Conclusions: Findings highlight the importance of self-regulation in dating violence perpetration-particularly for those with low average eBACs-and the need for varied intervention strategies, depending on one's typical drinking pattern. (J. Stud. Alcohol Drugs, 77, 150-159, 2016)

show abstract

Untitled

Cited by 110 publications

References 36 publications

Prevalence of Intimate Partner Violence Victimization and Victims’ Relational and Sexual Well-Being

Prevalence of Intimate Partner Violence Victimization and Victims’ Relational and Sexual Well-Being

Intimate partner victimization, poor relationship quality, and depressive symptoms during young adulthood

Daily Associations Between Alcohol Consumption and Dating Violence Perpetration Among Men and Women: Effects of Self-Regulation

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About