891c: Emergency Readmission Following Elective Endoscopy: Audit of 29,868 Day Case Procedures Performed At Four Teaching Hospitals in Northwest England

Moore, Allan F.; Ormerod, Clare; McMahon, Marie; Britton, Edward; Ramesh, Jayapal; Bodger, Keith; Lal, Simon; Sarkar, S

doi:10.1016/j.gie.2010.03.125

Cited by 1 publication

(2 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…From the literature review, 20 studies identified were audits of JAG standards, which are aligned with BSG recommendations. Fifteen were based on colonoscopy KPIs, four on endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP)16 20 38 39 and two on gastroscopy 15 37. Quality measures of published audits mainly comprised procedural completion rates14 16 21–23 28 29 33 34 38 39 and complications15 16 20 and also included comfort scores,37 45 gastric ulcer follow-up,31 42 antibiotic concordance in percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG),18 quality of bowel preparation22 51 and colonic biopsies for diarrhoea 41.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Fifteen were based on colonoscopy KPIs, four on endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP)16 20 38 39 and two on gastroscopy 15 37. Quality measures of published audits mainly comprised procedural completion rates14 16 21–23 28 29 33 34 38 39 and complications15 16 20 and also included comfort scores,37 45 gastric ulcer follow-up,31 42 antibiotic concordance in percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG),18 quality of bowel preparation22 51 and colonic biopsies for diarrhoea 41. Seven studies pertained to Bowel Cancer Screening (SAAS), reporting higher quality of care in accredited endoscopists compared with non-accredited counterparts in terms of CIR,19 27 43 52polyp detection rates (PDR),17 19 43 ADRs,19 27 43 adherence to tattoo placement17 25 and polyp retrieval rate 43…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Impact of the Joint Advisory Group on Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (JAG) on endoscopy services in the UK and beyond

Siau

Green

Hawkes

et al. 2018

Frontline Gastroenterol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The Joint Advisory Group on Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (JAG) was initially established in 1994 to standardise endoscopy training across specialties. Over the last two decades, the position of JAG has evolved to meet its current role of quality assuring all aspects of endoscopy in the UK to provide the highest quality, patient-centred care. Drivers such as changes to healthcare agenda, national audits, advances in research and technology and the advent of population-based cancer screening have underpinned this shift in priority. Over this period, JAG has spearheaded various quality assurance initiatives with support from national stakeholders. These have led to the achievement of notable milestones in endoscopy quality assurance, particularly in the three major areas of: (1) endoscopy training, (2) accreditation of endoscopy services (including the Global Rating Scale), and (3) accreditation of screening endoscopists. These developments have changed the landscape of UK practice, serving as a model to promote excellence in endoscopy. This review provides a summary of JAG initiatives and assesses the impact of JAG on training and endoscopy services within the UK and beyond.

show abstract