1986
DOI: 10.1080/00405008608658398
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

9—the Influence of Resistance to Compression on the Processing Performance of Superfine Wools Part I: Topmaking

Abstract: Two series of experiments carried out to assess the role of resistance to compression in Ihe topmaking performance of superfine wools are reported.Wotils of high resistance to compression gave lower scoured yields (by 4%) and top-and-noil yields (by 5%) and higher card wastes {by 2%) and noilages (by 37o) than wools of low resistance to compression. The tops produced from wools of high resistance to compression were shorter by 6 mm (Hauteur) than tops from wools of low resistance to compression. It is conclude… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The ratio of the Hauteur of the experimental cashmere to the MFD of the top, was 2.49 mm/ μ m compared with the mean values obtained for international cashmere tops of 2.37 mm/ μ m and Certo's (2001) recent report on a modern combing machine of 2.62 mm/ μ m. The improvements in lubrication may explain the increase in the ratio of Hauteur/MFD of wool reported over the past 15 years. In fine wool tops processed by Kurdo et al (1986) this ratio averaged to 2.82 mm/ μ m and with commercial fine wool tops examined by McGregor (2001) the mean (±SD) ratio of Hauteur/MFD was 3.41 (0.22) mm/ μ m (range 3.13‐3.69 mm/ μ m). Use of this mean and upper range ratio indicates that the potential Hauteur for Australian 16.6 μ m cashmere is 56‐61 mm.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The ratio of the Hauteur of the experimental cashmere to the MFD of the top, was 2.49 mm/ μ m compared with the mean values obtained for international cashmere tops of 2.37 mm/ μ m and Certo's (2001) recent report on a modern combing machine of 2.62 mm/ μ m. The improvements in lubrication may explain the increase in the ratio of Hauteur/MFD of wool reported over the past 15 years. In fine wool tops processed by Kurdo et al (1986) this ratio averaged to 2.82 mm/ μ m and with commercial fine wool tops examined by McGregor (2001) the mean (±SD) ratio of Hauteur/MFD was 3.41 (0.22) mm/ μ m (range 3.13‐3.69 mm/ μ m). Use of this mean and upper range ratio indicates that the potential Hauteur for Australian 16.6 μ m cashmere is 56‐61 mm.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…The improvements in lubrication may explain the increase in the ratio of Hauteur/MFD of wool reported over the past 15 years. In fine wool tops processed by Kurdo et al (1986) this ratio averaged to 2.82 mm/mm and with commercial fine wool tops examined by McGregor (2001) the mean (^SD) ratio of Hauteur/MFD was 3.41 (0.22) mm/mm (range 3.13-3.69 mm/mm). Use of this mean and upper range ratio indicates that the potential Hauteur for Australian 16.6mm cashmere is 56-61 mm.…”
Section: Cashmere Processingmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…The wool tops in this experiment had similar Hauteur (47.0 to 50.5 mm) compared to those produced with worsted processing equipment at the Australian Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO) where tops of 18.2 to 19.3 μm obtained Hauteur of 50.0 to 54.3 mm [8] and tops of 14.5 to 16.7 μm wool had Hauteur of 49.8 to 55.5 mm [22].…”
Section: Comparison Of Wool and Cashmere Topsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is limited information on the effects of wool fiber curvature on the properties of textile materials, especially knitwear. Some data on processing performance of low crimp wool has been published [8][9][10][11][12] yielding the result that low crimp/low curvature superfine wool produces a longer top as a consequence of less fiber entanglement during processing with reduced noil and increased yield of tops. 1 Research on worsted yarn and fabric properties has been reported together with the yarn processing performance of low crimp fine wools (e.g.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The variation in raw wool is caused by complicated interactions of genetical and environmental factors (Ryder & Stephenson, 1968). The importance of raw wool characteristics on price, processing stages and end-products is well known and reviewed (Ince, 1978;Nasrullah, 1983;Kurdo, 1985 andRobards, 1999).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%