1991
DOI: 10.1016/0378-5122(91)90134-c
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

90346536 A risk of malignancy index incorporating CA 125, ultrasound and menopausal status for the accurate preoperative diagnosis of ovarian cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To help clinicians decide on appropriate management, mathematical models to predict malignancy in adnexal masses have been developed on cohorts of patients that underwent surgery. A well‐known model is the risk‐of‐malignancy index (RMI) 5 . The International Ovarian Tumor Analysis (IOTA) group created and validated four models to estimate the risk of malignancy in adnexal masses: logistic regression model 1, logistic regression model 2, simple rules risk model (SRRisks) and Assessment of Different NEoplasias in the adneXa (ADNEX) 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To help clinicians decide on appropriate management, mathematical models to predict malignancy in adnexal masses have been developed on cohorts of patients that underwent surgery. A well‐known model is the risk‐of‐malignancy index (RMI) 5 . The International Ovarian Tumor Analysis (IOTA) group created and validated four models to estimate the risk of malignancy in adnexal masses: logistic regression model 1, logistic regression model 2, simple rules risk model (SRRisks) and Assessment of Different NEoplasias in the adneXa (ADNEX) 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Risk of Malignancy Index (RMI) algorithm combines CA125 levels, ultrasound results, and menopausal status [46]; however, despite the proposal of several combinations of the formula [47], the RMI possesses lower sensitivity than transvaginal sonography (TVS) alone [32,48]. For this reason, clinical trials such as the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian (PLCO) Cancer Screening Trial evaluated CA125 levels combined with TVS; however, the results failed to provide evidence of improvements in mortality rates or early-stage HGSOC detection rates [30,31,49,50].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%