“…The authors concluded that continued use of these agents with eGFR < 30 is appropriate, although one could equally argue that unmeasured comorbidities both caused clinicians to discontinue the agents and increased likelihood of adverse outcome. On the other end of the spectrum, Mottl et al analyzed 564 and 644 persons with youth onset T1D and T2D at mean ages 21 and 26 with mean durations 11 and 13 years, respectively, in the Search for Diabetes in Youth (SEARCH) and Treatment Options for Type 2 Diabetes in Adolescents and Youth (TODAY) studies; respective prevalences of ophthalmologic events were 0.11% and 0.40%, of CKD none and 0.06%, of neuropathy 0.11% and 0.21%, and of macrovascular diagnoses 0.08% and 0.33% over 10–13 year of observation, with overall rates 2.5‐fold higher for microvascular and 4.0‐fold higher for macrovascular disease 13 . Horton and Snell‐Bergeon reported that in a cohort of 597 people with T1D, each 1 SD increment in HbA1c variability was associated with a 1.6‐fold increase in cardiovascular disease (CVD) events, and a similar increment in mean HbA1c was associated with a 1.4‐fold such increase 14 …”