2001
DOI: 10.1023/a:1010621705591
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Untitled

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
47
0
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 203 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
0
47
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…(Natsal-3, for which fieldwork was completed in 2012, includes a larger section of health-related questions to find out how this affects sexual function. For a comprehensive discussion around the supposed asexuality of people with disabilities, see Milligan & Neufeldt, 2001.) The norms around sexual behaviour inadvertently created by population studies (including Natsal) may be problematic, potentially reinforcing feelings of inadequacy (Hart & Wellings, 2002), thus, perhaps, distress.…”
Section: Meaning Of This Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(Natsal-3, for which fieldwork was completed in 2012, includes a larger section of health-related questions to find out how this affects sexual function. For a comprehensive discussion around the supposed asexuality of people with disabilities, see Milligan & Neufeldt, 2001.) The norms around sexual behaviour inadvertently created by population studies (including Natsal) may be problematic, potentially reinforcing feelings of inadequacy (Hart & Wellings, 2002), thus, perhaps, distress.…”
Section: Meaning Of This Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast to bisexuality and homosexuality, asexuality may have escaped the legal attention common to other marginalised sexualities 'perhaps in part because it is lack of behavior or desire' (Scherrer, 2008, p. 637). Health and disability have been studied in relation to asexuality (variously defined -Bogaert, 2004;Poston & Baumle, 2010) and it is possible that pre-existing assumptions (Milligan & Neufeldt, 2001) have driven the study of asexuality in the direction of health and disability, and consequently its medicalisation. Yet, while unusual, we see no evidence that absence of sexual attraction is problematic; and as others note (Bogaert, 2006;Brotto et al, 2010;Prause & Graham, 2007), distress concerning this may in itself be problematic.…”
Section: Meaning Of This Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Orchard tasks during this stage of life (Rousso 1996;Schachter 2004;Van Damme and Biltereyst 2013). Having a physical disability may limit young peoples' physical functioning, but it does not always affect basic physiological and sexual drives or their desires for love, intimacy, and affection (Milligan and Neufeldt 2001). However, research demonstrates that youth with disabilities are often excluded from these normative models of sexuality and identity development on account of their portrayal as dependent, childlike, and in need of protection (Neufeld et al 2002;Suris et al 1996).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Shakespeare (2000) notes that sexuality is a site of oppression for people with disabilities in general, and historically the sexuality of people with intellectual disabilities has been constructed as potentially dangerous (Craft, 1987) or as absent (Milligan & Neufeldt, 2001). People in this group may be left with the sense that relationships and sex are not meant for them (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%