2000
DOI: 10.1023/a:1011983602860
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Untitled

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The scoring process involves assessing students' feedback, scoring each element or attribute evaluated, and then summing, averaging, or proportionally weighs the scores in various dimensions to get the overall score. In other words, the assessor assigns a score to each element and combines these scores to form an overall score [15], [18], [22]. Analytical scoring benefits more in giving more detailed diagnostic information on students' strengths and weaknesses in different areas of expertise [19], [20].…”
Section: Table 1 Personal Characteristics Of Teachersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The scoring process involves assessing students' feedback, scoring each element or attribute evaluated, and then summing, averaging, or proportionally weighs the scores in various dimensions to get the overall score. In other words, the assessor assigns a score to each element and combines these scores to form an overall score [15], [18], [22]. Analytical scoring benefits more in giving more detailed diagnostic information on students' strengths and weaknesses in different areas of expertise [19], [20].…”
Section: Table 1 Personal Characteristics Of Teachersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, they continue to manage the fraction p/q as two independent natural numbers p and q (Siegler & Pyke, 2013) or incline to the additive rather than the multiplicative expression of the relationship between p and q, i.e., they perceive 2/5 as 1/5 + 1/5 rather than 2 • 1 5 (Stafylidou & Vosniadou, 2004). They also consider that the more decimal digits a decimal number has, the larger it is (Moskal & Magone, 2000;Roell et al, 2017) and that a fraction increases when its terms increase (Chinnappan & Forrester, 2014;van Hoof et al, 2013). Roell et al (2019) claim that the whole number bias is at the root of errors in decimal magnitude comparison tasks.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%