2001
DOI: 10.1023/a:1011372311373
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Untitled

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…But our experiments showed that, even though the pH of the solution was 8.0, no precipitation was observed at the end of the adsorption process. At pH ) 4.0-5.0, uranyl is mainly in the state of UO 2 2+ and UO2OH 1+ , and little UO2(OH 2 0 ) exists (23). The UO2(OH 2 0 ) should be the precipitation of UO 2 2+ .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…But our experiments showed that, even though the pH of the solution was 8.0, no precipitation was observed at the end of the adsorption process. At pH ) 4.0-5.0, uranyl is mainly in the state of UO 2 2+ and UO2OH 1+ , and little UO2(OH 2 0 ) exists (23). The UO2(OH 2 0 ) should be the precipitation of UO 2 2+ .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The decrease in adsorption at pH >7 may be due to the fact that the existing state of UO 2 2+ does not favor the adsorption process. As it is known that when the pH is higher than 6.0, UO 2 2+ in the solution will be precipitated after standing for a certain time and will change the existing state of UO 2 2+ in the solution (23). Therefore, it seems that the pH of the solution used for adsorption should be lower than 6.0.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%