2002
DOI: 10.1023/a:1016865916073
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Untitled

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…126 -127 Moreover, to our knowledge, the only experimental data available in the case of boehmite is a pK measurement of 6.7 for the reaction (Al) n −OH + H + → (Al) n − OH 2 + (the coordination number n of the OH groups is unknown). 128 That the MUSIC model and the DFT-MD result provide quantitative different views is not surprising, as on the one hand the MUSIC model does not take into account the detailed local environment of the μ 1 -OH and μ 2 -OH sites at the surface and in particular does not take into account the nature of the hydrogen bonding with water (donor/acceptor characters of different strengths) nor the presence of the step at the surface, and on the other hand our estimate from DFT-MD is lacking statistics. Differences in pK of two sites of a surface have already been emphasized on the quartz/water interface, both theoretically 58 and experimentally.…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…126 -127 Moreover, to our knowledge, the only experimental data available in the case of boehmite is a pK measurement of 6.7 for the reaction (Al) n −OH + H + → (Al) n − OH 2 + (the coordination number n of the OH groups is unknown). 128 That the MUSIC model and the DFT-MD result provide quantitative different views is not surprising, as on the one hand the MUSIC model does not take into account the detailed local environment of the μ 1 -OH and μ 2 -OH sites at the surface and in particular does not take into account the nature of the hydrogen bonding with water (donor/acceptor characters of different strengths) nor the presence of the step at the surface, and on the other hand our estimate from DFT-MD is lacking statistics. Differences in pK of two sites of a surface have already been emphasized on the quartz/water interface, both theoretically 58 and experimentally.…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…High values of C Stern (greater than 1.7 F/m 2 ) for a nonporous surface can be attributed to complexation of ions in solution with silanol groups . This is because ionic complexation has been reported to shift the point of zero charge from its value as the mean of the p K a ’s, when only protons are the potential determining ions, to another value. According to our empirical relation, a slight difference in pH pzc results in a significant change in C Stern , e.g., compared to pH pzc = 2.44 with C Stern = 2.3 F/m 2 , pH pzc = 2.36 yields C Stern = 1.7 F/m 2 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Changes in pH upon the introduction of salts can be understood by analyzing site-binding models for the boehmite–water interface. Most are 2-p K a triple-layer models, although Hiemstra developed a simplified 1-p K a model. These place the pristine point of zero charge between 8.5 and 9.1.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These place the pristine point of zero charge between 8.5 and 9.1. Data on ionic adsorption are limited, but Bogdanova et al 87 and Klebanov et al 89 compared NaCl and KCl salts and Wood et al 91 considered KNO 3 salts. While Bogdanova et al 87 found that Na + , K + , and Cl − have roughly equivalent binding strengths, Wood et al 91 determined that K + binds more strongly than NO 3 − , driving pH shifts at high ionic strength.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%