2002
DOI: 10.1023/a:1021379306349
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Untitled

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The former reduces fossil fuel consumption and indirectly reduces carbon emissions, whereas the latter directly absorbs CO 2 from the atmosphere and thereby reduces carbon emissions. In comparison, the emission reduction effect of forests as a carbon sequestration tool is superior [40]. This view is supported by Ma et al, who found that replacing fossil energy with forest bioenergy was effective in reducing emissions in mature commercial forests where it already existed [42].…”
Section: Discussion On the Argumentation Ideas For The Effectiveness ...mentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The former reduces fossil fuel consumption and indirectly reduces carbon emissions, whereas the latter directly absorbs CO 2 from the atmosphere and thereby reduces carbon emissions. In comparison, the emission reduction effect of forests as a carbon sequestration tool is superior [40]. This view is supported by Ma et al, who found that replacing fossil energy with forest bioenergy was effective in reducing emissions in mature commercial forests where it already existed [42].…”
Section: Discussion On the Argumentation Ideas For The Effectiveness ...mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The third category, which focuses on the role and drivers of forestry carbon sinks, is also a literature that is of interest in this study. As an investment project, forestry carbon sinks are not a sure thing [39,40]. In the field of economics, researchers typically use econometric models to examine the role and drivers of the FCSM.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%