2000
DOI: 10.1023/a:1026568912809
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Untitled

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
31
0
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 108 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
4
31
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…the electron temperature of 1 MK, it has been found necessary to adopt an increasing ion temperature above 1.5 R8 in order to fit the outer DVCS points, rising to 14 MK at 1.8 R8. This is in general agreement with the earlier analysis of Antonucci et al (2000).…”
Section: Extension To Include Dves Interplume Datasupporting
confidence: 93%
“…the electron temperature of 1 MK, it has been found necessary to adopt an increasing ion temperature above 1.5 R8 in order to fit the outer DVCS points, rising to 14 MK at 1.8 R8. This is in general agreement with the earlier analysis of Antonucci et al (2000).…”
Section: Extension To Include Dves Interplume Datasupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Figure 3 shows that our choice of N e is able to reproduce the observed line ratios in interplumes with negligible outflow velocity up to 1.3 R¢ . Above this altitude, the comparison with UVCS data obtained on 21 May 1996 in interplume lanes by [4] shows that the region where the fast solar wind is accelerated lies above 1.2 solar radii, as already suggested by [2].…”
Section: Obssupporting
confidence: 77%
“…Recent analyses of SUMER and UVCS data [see e. g. 1,2,3] have shown that the width of UV lines is larger in interplume than in plume regions, hinting to interplumes as the site where energy is preferentially deposited and, possibly, fast wind emanates. Moreover, the [4] analysis of fast polar wind seems to favor the low density regions as sources of the fast wind streams.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The middle panel of Fig. 3 compares the results of proton and electron temperature with the observed proton temperature [data with error bars are by Esser et al (1999); open squares are UVCS/SOHO observation by Antonucci, Dodero & Giordano (2000)] and electron temperature [open circles are CDS/SOHO observation by Fludra, Del Zanna & Bromage (1999)] in the polar holes and the observed electron temperature in the mid-latitude streamer [filled diamonds and triangles are CDS,UVCS/SOHO by Parenti et al (2000)]. Please note that the proton temperature is higher than the electron temperature in both models.…”
Section: Structure Of Corona and Solar Windmentioning
confidence: 99%