Untitled

Anderson, Kristin J.; Leaper, Campbell

doi:10.1023/a:1018802521676

Cited by 144 publications

(44 citation statements)

References 67 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Interruptions are either simultaneous (the interrupter initiates talk while the current speaker is still talking) or 'silent' (the interrupter starts during a short pause in the interruptee's turn with no simultaneous speech). Following Anderson and Leaper (1998), interruptions in this research are intrusive. Intrusive interruptions (IIs) are ones that interfere in another's talking turn and are used to dominate the other (Karakowsky, McBey, & Miller, 2004).…”

Section: Definition Of Interruptionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Interruptions of Men and Women in Selected Debates of Al-Jazeera Arabic Channel: A Pragmatic Analysis of the Opposite Direction

Tartory¹

2019

IJEL

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The present study aims to explore the gender patterns during interruptions in the context of political television discussions in the Arab community. Five mixed-sex episodes of the well-known program “The Opposite Direction” presented on Al-Jazeera Channel were examined. Quantitative and qualitative analyses were carried out to determine, which gender did more interruptions than the other. The study has considered each gender to use verbal and non-verbal statements to express that they were doing interruptions or that they were being interrupted. The results showed that women interrupted more than did men. Moreover, it has also been shown that men reacted in a more severe and aggressive way, when they were interrupted by women.

show abstract

Section: Definition Of Interruptionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Interruptions of Men and Women in Selected Debates of Al-Jazeera Arabic Channel: A Pragmatic Analysis of the Opposite Direction

Tartory¹

2019

IJEL

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Thus, Eagly [18], for example, famously argued that the stereotypic male and female behaviors to arise from the social roles assumed by men and women. All in all, women have been argued to be more emotionally expressive than men [8,9,24,25] and men have been demonstrated to be more dominant than women, for example, regarding the amount of talk [38], the use of directives [49], and the tendency to engage in interruptions [1]. Many of these gender characteristics have been found to be particularly prevalent in mixed-gender dyads.…”

Section: Gender and Interpersonal Behaviormentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The participants of the study are 14 females in 7 female dyads and 18 males in 9 male dyads. 1 The participants did not know each other from before; they had been recruited to the study via email lists.…”

Section: Participants and Procedures For Obtaining The Video-recorded mentioning

confidence: 99%

Affiliation and Dominance in Female and Male Dyads: When Discoordination Makes Happy

et al. 2018

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Drawing on sixteen 45-min-long dyadic same-sex conversations between unacquainted females or males, we used the joystick method by Sadler et al. (J Pers Soc Psychol 97:1005-1020. https ://doi.org/10.1037/a0016 232, 2009) to rate the moment-to-moment levels of affiliation and dominance during the first and last 10 min of these conversations. Besides comparing the behavioral patterns in female and male dyads, we drew on the pre-and post-conversation questionnaires filled by the participants of the rated conversations to study the experiential consequences (valence, arousal, happiness, anxiety) of these patterns. Both genders exhibited the same complementary patterns where affiliation pulls for affiliation and dominance for submissiveness. However, these patterns were experienced differently by females and males. Greater affiliation synchrony increased the levels of happiness and arousal for males, but not for females. In addition, greater dominance coordination predicted a more negative valence change for females than for males. The paper thus points to gender differences in what constitutes a positive interactional experience and suggests a need to revisit social scientific theorizing in this regard.

show abstract

“…Initiating overlapping speech is typically associated with dominance (Anderson and Leaper, 1998) and higher-status (Leffler et al, 1982). Therefore, a possible reason why receivers initiate overlapping speech significantly more frequently than callers is that they tend to be perceived, and perceive themselves, as higherstatus individuals.…”

Section: Role Effects: Calling Vs Receivingmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In the case of silences, the lower frequency during disagreement can have at least two possible reasons. The first is that people tend to react immediately to interlocutors they disagree with Bilmes (1988), thus reducing, if not eliminating, the latency time in responding. The second is that conversation participants tend to hold the floor during competitive interactions (Smith-Lovin and Brody, 1989) and, therefore, the chances of observing silence are reduced.…”

Section: Mode Of Interaction Effects: Agreement Vs Disagreementmentioning

confidence: 99%

When the Words are Not Everything: The Use of Laughter, Fillers, Back-Channel, Silence, and Overlapping Speech in Phone Calls

Vinciarelli

Chatziioannou

Esposito³

2015

Front. ICT

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This article presents an observational study on how some common conversational cueslaughter, fillers, back-channel, silence, and overlapping speech-are used during mobile phone conversations. The observations are performed over the SSPNet Mobile Corpus, a collection of 60 calls between pairs of unacquainted individuals (120 subjects for roughly 12 h of material in total). The results show that the temporal distribution of the social signals above is not uniform, but it rather reflects the social meaning they carry and convey. In particular, the results show significant use differences depending on factors such as gender, role (caller or receiver), topic, mode of interaction (agreement or disagreement), personality traits, and conflict handling style.

show abstract

Untitled

Cited by 144 publications

References 67 publications

Interruptions of Men and Women in Selected Debates of Al-Jazeera Arabic Channel: A Pragmatic Analysis of the Opposite Direction

Interruptions of Men and Women in Selected Debates of Al-Jazeera Arabic Channel: A Pragmatic Analysis of the Opposite Direction

Affiliation and Dominance in Female and Male Dyads: When Discoordination Makes Happy

When the Words are Not Everything: The Use of Laughter, Fillers, Back-Channel, Silence, and Overlapping Speech in Phone Calls

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About