2000
DOI: 10.1023/a:1021811600752
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Untitled

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Before 2008, the most intense swarm occurred in 1985/1986 with more than 8,000 recorded events and M L,max = 4.5 (Neunhöfer and Meier 2004). The swarm in January 1997 consisted of more than 1,800 events with M L,max = 3.0 (Horálek et al 2000b). There, the activity clustered in two subclusters with different types of source mechanisms, whereas one type comprised volumetric source changes (tensile earthquakes) and the other one showed pure shear faulting (Vavryčuk 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Before 2008, the most intense swarm occurred in 1985/1986 with more than 8,000 recorded events and M L,max = 4.5 (Neunhöfer and Meier 2004). The swarm in January 1997 consisted of more than 1,800 events with M L,max = 3.0 (Horálek et al 2000b). There, the activity clustered in two subclusters with different types of source mechanisms, whereas one type comprised volumetric source changes (tensile earthquakes) and the other one showed pure shear faulting (Vavryčuk 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Seismohydrological precursor 11 effects could also be observed on this occasion but with different characteristics than in 2000. 12 Thus, it became possible to compare and contrast these two most important swarmquake 13 periods of the recent past from both a seismological as well as a seismohydrological point of 14 view. Such a comparison, however, is only by its nature semi-quantitative.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the present case, this is expressed by different time 10 spans between the hydrological anomalies and earthquakes (12 to 36 days) and the shape and 11 duration of the anomalies (a few days to 8 months). Therefore, it is not possible at present to 12 derive a systematic relationship between anomaly occurrence and seismic activity, as proposed 13 within the common earthquake prediction debate (e.g. Nature, February/March 1999).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7), and swarm-like character of the earthquakes has been observed in many regions of the world (e.g., Hill et al, 1985;Dorel et al, 1995 andreview in Špičák, 2000). In the western part of the Bohemian Massif, where Cainozoic volcanic activity and fluid migration is also typical, microswarms and swarms with an unusually large number of events were described (e.g., Skácelová et al, 1995;Horálek et al, 2000). The most intense seismic activity in western Bohemia is concentrated in a relatively narrow zone where swarms of typically several hundreds to thousands of micro-earthquakes occur within a volume of only a few cubic kilometres (Nový Kostel focal zone).…”
Section: Nysa-morava Fault Zone and Origin Of Seismicitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most intense seismic activity in western Bohemia is concentrated in a relatively narrow zone where swarms of typically several hundreds to thousands of micro-earthquakes occur within a volume of only a few cubic kilometres (Nový Kostel focal zone). Several subordinate focal zones with a much lower number of earthquakes (up to several dozens during individual micro-swarms) and with maximum magnitudes of 1.0 to 2.5 has been described, too (Horálek et al, 2000;V. Nehybka, IPE, personal communication, 2000−2004.…”
Section: Nysa-morava Fault Zone and Origin Of Seismicitymentioning
confidence: 99%