1981
DOI: 10.2524/jtappij.35.913
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Untitled

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…LAEs are found to be larger for galaxies with higher stellar mass, higher dust obscuration, and higher star formation rate (averaged over 100 Myr, see Guaita et al 2011). These results are broadly consistent with the numerical simulations of Shimizu & Umemura (2010), who predict that size, stellar mass, and star formation rate will correlate positively with the mass-weighted age of LAEs.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…LAEs are found to be larger for galaxies with higher stellar mass, higher dust obscuration, and higher star formation rate (averaged over 100 Myr, see Guaita et al 2011). These results are broadly consistent with the numerical simulations of Shimizu & Umemura (2010), who predict that size, stellar mass, and star formation rate will correlate positively with the mass-weighted age of LAEs.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…This suggests a scenario in which galaxy interactions, as well as providing fuel for star formation (Tilvi et al 2011), sufficiently disrupt and ionise the ISM to give Lyα photons an easy escape. Shimizu & Umemura (2010) presented a model in which galaxies can not only appear as LAEs when a burst of star-formation occurs (i.e. a Lyαbright phase; see also Dijkstra & Wyithe 2007;Nagamine et al 2007), but also when a young satellite galaxy is accreted onto a more massive object.…”
Section: Lyα Blobs (Labs)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In spite of extensive observational and theoretical efforts in the decade after the first discovery of LABs, the formation mechanisms of LABs are still controversial (Mori & Umemura 2006;Dijkstra & Loeb 2009;Geach et al 2009;Scarlata et al 2009;Faucher-Giguere et al 2010;Goerdt et al 2010;Shimizu & Umemura 2010). Among the LABs, special attention has been given to the largest examples with the spatial extents of ∼100-200 kpc (hereinafter giant LABs) because of their spectacular morphologies and possible association with protoclusters (Steidel et al 2000;Palunas et al 2004;Prescott et al 2008;Matsuda et al 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%