Untitled

Bos, Kees van den; Maas, Marjolein; Waldring, Ismintha; Semin, Gün R.

doi:10.1023/a:1024252104717

Cited by 48 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 58 publications

(89 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…This is consistent with research that has found that negative information can be more consequential in shaping attitudes than positive information (e.g., Mondak et al 2017). In this way, the present study is consistent with others in suggesting that unjust events exert stronger effects on people's cognitions and reactions than just events (e.g., Van den Bos et al 2003).…”

Section: Resultssupporting

confidence: 93%

“…Thus, when confronted with a clear case of an unfair process that a victim has experienced, they can be expected to draw general conclusions about state efforts to prevent and reduce GBV. Moreover, because people assign more weight to negative information (Baumeister et al 2001;Mondak et al 2017;Van den Bos et al 2003), evidence of an IPV victim being treated unfairly should have an especially strong impact on their evaluations of government's performance.…”

Section: Procedural Fairness and Attitudes Toward The Government's Pe...mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Does Procedural Fairness Influence Evaluations of Government Efforts to Combat Gender-Based Violence? Evidence from Brazil

Rabello Kras

2023

Pol & Gen

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Does information about the way victims of gender-based violence (GBV) are treated by the police influence evaluations of government policies to combat gender-based violence? I theorize that because most citizens have incomplete information about such policies, information about procedural fairness should be given more weight when forming evaluations of the government’s performance in this domain. Using original experiments embedded in public opinion surveys collected from Brazil, I find that information about procedural unfairness powerfully predicts more critical evaluations of GBV laws and the government’s performance in helping victims. In addition, these critical opinions influence bystander intervention attitudes. Mediation analysis confirms that views of procedural unfairness are critical in explaining these effects. The implications of the findings for the implementation of specialized services are discussed in the results and conclusion.

show abstract

Section: Resultssupporting

confidence: 93%

Section: Procedural Fairness and Attitudes Toward The Government's Pe...mentioning

confidence: 99%

Does Procedural Fairness Influence Evaluations of Government Efforts to Combat Gender-Based Violence? Evidence from Brazil

Rabello Kras

2023

Pol & Gen

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Affect intensity—how strongly people react emotionally to situations—also moderated responses to PPJ. High affect intensity predicted more intense negative responses to low PPJ (Van den Bos, Maas, Waldring, & Semin, 2003). In another study, people with high affect intensity were unable to regulate their anger about an unwelcome decision even when they perceived high procedural justice in the decision-making; among their low-affect intensity peers, PPJ did reduce anger (Murphy, 2009).…”

Section: Dispositional Moderators Of Ppj Effects—avoidant and Anxious...mentioning

confidence: 99%

Perceived procedural justice and conflict management in intimate relationships: The moderating effects of anxious attachment and personal power.

Nelson¹,

Peleg-Koriat²,

Ben-Ari³

2018

Couple and Family Psychology: Research and Practice

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Perceived procedural justice (PPJ) was recently associated with collaborative conflict management styles among married and cohabiting spouses. In a correlational study of 160 adults, we tested how avoidant and anxious attachment and personal power perceptions moderate the associations between spouse’s PPJ and participants’ conflict management styles, because previous research (e.g., in organizations) suggested that personal traits and status-related power moderated responsiveness to procedural justice. In our study, participants who perceived themselves as powerful were less responsive to spouse’s PPJ, as was evident by its lower or insignificant correlations with their inclination for collaborative conflict management styles. Anxious attachment also moderated responsiveness to spouse’s PPJ, by changing its nature; anxious participants who reported more spouse’s PPJ did not reciprocate it; they were more dominating and contrary to their peers, no more compromising. Interpretations for these findings are discussed in the article.

show abstract

“…The above highlights the importance of perception and self-perception. The way people observe and interpret their environment and themselves determines their reactions at cognitive, physiological (affective) and behavioural level (Van den Bos et al, 2003). It also determines how such person would perform in a situation to overcome stressors.…”

Section: Individual Leader's Communication Of Understanding To Teammentioning

confidence: 99%

The modern military leader as sensemaker on the battlefield

Ntusi¹

2022

SCIM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The study on which this article reports, addressed the problem with which modern military leaders on the battlefield are faced in assisting the soldier at basic level to make sense of what is happening. In this study, the term ‘sensemaker’ implied a process of individual and group sensemaking that forms the basis for meaning-making in the volatile, unpredictable, complex and ambiguous (VUCA) world within which soldiers are functioning. The authors postulate a best-fit world view for military leaders in this military leadership sensemaking and meaning-making nexus. They coined ‘social constructivism in complexity’ where the military leader acts as a guide for soldiers through a sensemaking process. This process is graphically represented, and requires a toolkit to assist military leaders in working as sensemakers on the battlefield. The article concludes with recommendations to military psychologists and military educators who have to make policy changes to develop and implement such a toolkit for sensemaking on the battlefield.

show abstract

Untitled

Cited by 48 publications

References 58 publications

Does Procedural Fairness Influence Evaluations of Government Efforts to Combat Gender-Based Violence? Evidence from Brazil

Does Procedural Fairness Influence Evaluations of Government Efforts to Combat Gender-Based Violence? Evidence from Brazil

Perceived procedural justice and conflict management in intimate relationships: The moderating effects of anxious attachment and personal power.

The modern military leader as sensemaker on the battlefield

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About