2001
DOI: 10.1023/a:1012003611371
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Untitled

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The principal component analysis validated LDSS method and Seuclid distance combining Single cluster method in core subset construction. The Seuclid distance was also validated in maize core subset construction (Crossa et al, 1995;Malosetti and Abadie, 2001). Core subsets constructed by Cosine and Correlation showed bad representativeness compared to those constructed by Euclid, Seuclid, Mahal and Cityblock.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The principal component analysis validated LDSS method and Seuclid distance combining Single cluster method in core subset construction. The Seuclid distance was also validated in maize core subset construction (Crossa et al, 1995;Malosetti and Abadie, 2001). Core subsets constructed by Cosine and Correlation showed bad representativeness compared to those constructed by Euclid, Seuclid, Mahal and Cityblock.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Core collections have been assembled based on several algorithms [5-8] in several crops, including durum and bread wheats [5,6], barley [7], potato [8], maize [9], peanut [10], and rice [11]. The usage of molecular markers as descriptors of population structure provides the most reliable criteria when assembling core collections [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The majority of the proposed strategies vary in their methods by either the stratification of the reference collection in groups that are genetically closer when examined according to some criteria, or by taking a straight sample of the accessions that will make up the core collection according to a specific methodology. Stratification can be based on criteria which include morpho-physiological and agronomical traits [3], geographical parameters [4], biochemical traits [5], or molecular data [6]. Stratified random sampling methodologies include random sampling with no regard to group origin, sampling proportionate to the size of the groups, or proportionate to the natural logarithms of the size of the groups that are composed after the first stage of stratification [7], or may even be based on more concrete data on allelic composition of the reference population [8] or based on genetic distance estimated by biochemical or molecular markers [9-13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%