1997
DOI: 10.1023/a:1006505805093
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Untitled

Abstract: This research explored eldercare among Mexican American primary family caregivers from Dallas and Fort Worth, Texas. Although these caregivers expressed feelings of burden, their ethnocultural values of familism placed burden in a broader cultural context in which caregiving was also viewed as an affirmation and fulfillment of core Mexican American cultural values. Mexican American familism includes expressions of family solidarity, ethnocultural determinants of informal caregiving, distrust of culturally alie… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These four factors (familism, obligation, burden, and intensity) are supported by prior caregiver studies with Latino samples and in the broader literature. For example, familism has been described as a structure of the Latino family that explains interrelations regarding child rearing, god parenting, surrogate grand parenting, and elder caregiving (John, Resendiz, & De Vargas, 1997;Losada et al, 2010;Mendez-Luck et al, 2016;Scharlach et al, 2006). Our findings are especially consistent with those of prior literature on family interconnectedness and identification (Almeida et al, 2009;Lugo-Steidel & Contreras, 2003;Sabogal et al, 1987) as they relate to beliefs on elder caregiving.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…These four factors (familism, obligation, burden, and intensity) are supported by prior caregiver studies with Latino samples and in the broader literature. For example, familism has been described as a structure of the Latino family that explains interrelations regarding child rearing, god parenting, surrogate grand parenting, and elder caregiving (John, Resendiz, & De Vargas, 1997;Losada et al, 2010;Mendez-Luck et al, 2016;Scharlach et al, 2006). Our findings are especially consistent with those of prior literature on family interconnectedness and identification (Almeida et al, 2009;Lugo-Steidel & Contreras, 2003;Sabogal et al, 1987) as they relate to beliefs on elder caregiving.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…It is often argued that Hispanics and, in particular, Mexican Americans place family interest above individual interest (Aranda & Knight, 1997; John, Resendiz, & De Vargas, 1997; Sayegh & Knight, 2011). Caregiving may represent filial duty and be seen as an expected part of the life course, especially for women.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Familism is embedded in an extended-family network that includes family members such as aunts, uncles, cousins, and in-laws (Keefe, 1984; Sabogal et al, 1987). Researchers have considered familism as a key factor to explain interrelations in this extended network (John, Resendiz, & De Vargas, 1997; Losada et al, 2010; Scharlach et al, 2006; Shurgot & Knight, 2005) and to explain family roles and obligations for such responsibilities as child rearing, godparenting, surrogate grandparenting, and—to a lesser extent—elder caregiving (Delgado, 2007; Gonzalez, Germán, & Fabrett, 2012; John et al, 1997; Losada et al, 2010; Scharlach et al, 2006; Shurgot & Knight, 2005). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, Losada et al (2006) found that higher scores on familism scales were inversely correlated with lower scores on caregiving burden, but Crist et al (2009) found no statistically significant correlation between the two. One qualitative study of Mexican American caregivers found that familism was an important factor in their caregiving decision making and social support systems (John et al, 1997). Two other studies of Latino caregivers found that familism was a motivation for providing care and was associated with perceived positive caregiving experiences (Scharlach et al, 2006) and the acceptance and fulfillment of the caregiving role without complaint (Magana, Schwartz, Rubert, & Szapocznik, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%