2001
DOI: 10.1023/a:1011548709573
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Untitled

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 109 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The models are suitable for well-explored areas in order to detail exploration surveys and c) Hybrid models which are considered based on both expert's opinions and locations of known mineralization occurrences in the area to assign weight to the evidence criteria. Some of the most important knowledge-driven methods are index overlay [5,20], fuzzy logic technique [26,29,31], wildcat method [7]and multi-criteria decision making methods [1,28]. In recent decades, various data-driven techniques developed and led to advances in the development of MPM such as neural networks(NN) [3,32,38,40], Bayesian classifiers [35], support vector machines (SVM) [12,19,54,58], and random forest method [8,39,44].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The models are suitable for well-explored areas in order to detail exploration surveys and c) Hybrid models which are considered based on both expert's opinions and locations of known mineralization occurrences in the area to assign weight to the evidence criteria. Some of the most important knowledge-driven methods are index overlay [5,20], fuzzy logic technique [26,29,31], wildcat method [7]and multi-criteria decision making methods [1,28]. In recent decades, various data-driven techniques developed and led to advances in the development of MPM such as neural networks(NN) [3,32,38,40], Bayesian classifiers [35], support vector machines (SVM) [12,19,54,58], and random forest method [8,39,44].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generating a mineral potential map derived from remote-sensing data through a GISbased approach has therefore became a fast and accurate tool for identification of target areas for mineral exploration [7,8], particularly during the reconnaissance stage. Since the advent of GIS-based spatial analysis approaches, advances have been achieved in revealing prospective areas of hydrothermal mineral resources [24][25][26]. This is because integration of spatially distributed remote-sensing data using a GIS technique is a significant approach to mineral exploration, as it allows combining multiple datasets through digital overlay methods in order to optimize mineral prospection maps [27].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is because integration of spatially distributed remote-sensing data using a GIS technique is a significant approach to mineral exploration, as it allows combining multiple datasets through digital overlay methods in order to optimize mineral prospection maps [27]. For example, the GISbased knowledge-driven method is efficient to produce predictive maps based on expert judgment [8] as each GIS predictive layer is assigned a weight reflecting importance in the modeling process [1,24]. Furthermore, each evidential map representing HAZs and/or fracture/fault zones was given a weight reflecting its significance in the prospective mode.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prediction of ore body location is critical for mineral exploration [1][2][3][4], which is generally achieved by analysing the associations of geological factors, geophysical and geochemical fields with mineralization. Such associations are commonly represented as 2D maps, and quantitatively analysed in the platform of 2D Geographic Information System (GIS), which have definitely facilitated the understanding of mineralization systems and predictive exploration of mineral resources [5][6][7]. However, such 2D studies are insufficient to present and analyse complicated mineralization systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These methods are divided into two classes, knowledge-driven methods and data-driven methods [41,42]. The common knowledge-driven methods include Fuzzy logic [43], Analytical hierarchy process [6], Index Overlay [44] and Inference Networks and Decision tress in expert systems [45]. The common data-driven methods include Weights of Evidence (WofE) [46,47], Logic Regression [48] and Neural Networks [49].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%