1997
DOI: 10.1023/a:1005884717655
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Untitled

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

3
27
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 229 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
3
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We observed a significant increase of the F 0 , especially when seedlings were grown under high temperatures. Such an increase has been observed previously in other crops [31, 32], and it has been associated to a dissociation of part of the outer antenna from the rest of the PSII [33] or to a shift in the equilibrium between the electron acceptors Q A and Q B which enhance back electron transfer from Q B to Q A [31, 34]. In this later scenario, Q A will remain partially reduced in darkness and the O-step no longer represents the F 0 .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…We observed a significant increase of the F 0 , especially when seedlings were grown under high temperatures. Such an increase has been observed previously in other crops [31, 32], and it has been associated to a dissociation of part of the outer antenna from the rest of the PSII [33] or to a shift in the equilibrium between the electron acceptors Q A and Q B which enhance back electron transfer from Q B to Q A [31, 34]. In this later scenario, Q A will remain partially reduced in darkness and the O-step no longer represents the F 0 .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…The drastic decrease in Fv/Fm, epoxidation state, and Chl a/Chl b ratio for the 0.32-max culture compared to the 0.97-max and the P-replete cultures is in agreement with the necessity to dissipate excess energy for the cells under this treatment. The negative relationship between the Fv/Fm ratio and the degree of P limitation was mainly caused by an increase in cellular F0, as standardized to Chl a, which implies damage or inactivation of photosystem II (58). The higher RFL, independent of Chl a content, for the 0.32-max treatment confirms this.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…Guo et al (2005) found that lower A under heat stress was due to reduction in leaf chlorophyll contents. Damage to electron transport chain especially at photosynthesis II or inhibition of CO 2 fixation under heat stress may also disturb photosynthesis which is the key process for photo-assimilate production (Havaux and Tardy, 1996; Yamane et al, 1997). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%