2003
DOI: 10.1023/a:1023670918923
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Untitled

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The following results were obtained from the study of proton microaffinities and the calculation of the first proton macroaffinity of the metal complexes using eqs 10−12: (1) For all complexes, the smallest calculated proton microaffinity is related to the amine group on the coordinated ethylene arm, and the greatest one is related to the amine group on the butylene arm (see Table ). This is consistent with the fact that seven-membered chelate rings are less stable than six-membered rings and that both are less stable than five-membered chelate rings. , (2) As can be seen in Table , the smallest proton macroaffinity is calculated for the [Zn(tren)] 2+ complex. In fact, the order of the first proton macroaffinity for the Zn 2+ complexes is [ Zn(tren)] 2+ < [Zn(pee)] 2+ < [Zn(ppe)] 2+ < [Zn(tpt)] 2+ < [Zn(ppb)] 2+ .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 82%
“…The following results were obtained from the study of proton microaffinities and the calculation of the first proton macroaffinity of the metal complexes using eqs 10−12: (1) For all complexes, the smallest calculated proton microaffinity is related to the amine group on the coordinated ethylene arm, and the greatest one is related to the amine group on the butylene arm (see Table ). This is consistent with the fact that seven-membered chelate rings are less stable than six-membered rings and that both are less stable than five-membered chelate rings. , (2) As can be seen in Table , the smallest proton macroaffinity is calculated for the [Zn(tren)] 2+ complex. In fact, the order of the first proton macroaffinity for the Zn 2+ complexes is [ Zn(tren)] 2+ < [Zn(pee)] 2+ < [Zn(ppe)] 2+ < [Zn(tpt)] 2+ < [Zn(ppb)] 2+ .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Therefore the present results are completely consistent with this fact that six-membered chelate rings are less stable than fivemembered chelate rings. 14,15 This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2009 a The data in parentheses are calculated using LanL2DZ basis set. b 2,2; 2,3 and 3,3 correspond to a secondary amine located between two ethylene arms, one ethylene and one propylene arm or two propylene arms, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[22][23][24][25][26] Second, the formation constants of both the latter complexes and their protonated form have been reported in the literature. 27 Third, the molecular structures and correct formulations for a number of present metal complexes and their protonated form have been determined by X-ray crystal structure analysis. [28][29][30] Thus, we can easily study the degree of agreement between our theoretical results and the experimental data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%